Question 68: How does your organization share operational and process safety information to foster an environment of continuous improvement?

MPC utilizes the AFPM Safety Portal to communicate and share experiences and knowledge within our FCC Advisory Group. It is a vital component of our goal to improve process safety performance. We also have a Process Safety Advisory Program to learn from external industry and internal MPC process safety events, significant near misses, and high value learning events.

Question 67: The industry continues to experience process safety incidents associated with FCC electrostatic precipitators. What are you doing to prevent these incidents?

Phillips 66 has six ESPs (electrostatic precipitators) in service. We have not been immune to serious incidents on our ESPs. In 1994, we had an ESP explosion, which led to a fatality. So, in order to minimize the likelihood of these kinds of incidents happening again, the company has a standard that all of the refineries are required to follow.

Question 64: What are acceptable makeup water streams that can be used for coke cutting which will not affect the coke quality?

With regard to coke quality, a lot of the available streams are acceptable. A few of the additional considerations to take into account are: Is this makeup water stream going to add overall load to my wastewater treatment facility? Is this new water? Is this water that I can recycle? Streams that are acceptable are: stripped sour water. If you are not reusing this water at your desalters or FCC wet gas scrubbers, then it would be an acceptable stream. 

Question 62: When increasing the vacuum tower cutpoint, what measures have you employed to mitigate the impact of chlorides in the overhead diesel or light vacuum gas oil sections of the vacuum tower?

Calcium chloride is likely the bigger culprit in vacuum towers. If there is a 100°F difference in crude and vacuum transfer temperatures, some hydrolysis in the vacuum tower will occur. If the desired vacuum tower cutpoint can be achieved in a different way other than maximizing vacuum heater temperature, such as lowering column pressure, hydrolysis and subsequent salt formation will be reduced.

Question 61: What are the advantages and disadvantages of preflash/pre-topping columns in crude units in terms of operational flexibility to process different API crudes? Please comment on overall energy efficiency and reliability (corrosion).

Preflash drums are useful for removing the vapor from the feed to the atmospheric tower, but there is a lot of debate about its purpose. Many people believe that this is done for energy purposes, but I think those who really study this come to the realization that it is not for energy.

Question 60: Please describe your experience with the occurrence of phosphorus and barium fouling in the distillate section of the crude tower. What steps have you taken to identify and mitigate the problem?

I know this topic generated a lot of discussion in our Hydrotreating session yesterday. I am mainly, obviously, going to focus on the crude side of it. I will start by saying that basically, it starts with a process to analyze processed crudes for impurities to manage and minimize fouling coming from salts, asphaltene precipitation, and other impurities.

Question 59: What is your experience with hot preheat train and heater fouling attributed to waxy crudes? What methods can be used to identify fouling that is specific to wax in crudes?

For the black and yellow wax, really the biggest issues we have seen are actually from what looks like upstream additives – bromides, in particular – that are coming out in the hydroprocessing area as bromic chloride salts. So that is a little different. Typically, we worry about ammonium chloride. Those two crudes tend to have bromine-type contamination, so you do see some issues with them.