Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2008) Question 98: What metallurgy are you using for mesh pads in reformer compressor suction knockout drums? How often are the mesh pads inspected and how often are they replaced? Are the same criteria used for mesh pads in product separators?

Question 98 What metallurgy are you using for mesh pads in reformer compressor suction knockout drums? How often are the mesh pads inspected and how often are they replaced? Are the same criteria used for mesh pads in product separators? Rick Grubb (Chevron USA) We typically use 304 SS demister pads in the refinery and inspect them every 10 years. In reforming service we have been using Tefzel demister pads and have been replacing them approximately every dump and screen due to separator internal inspections. If we go into the vessel we go ahead and inspect the mesh pad, but assume before opening the vessel that the pad will need replacing. The Tefzel pads have greatly increased the reliability such that we don’t find mesh pad pieces in the compressors anymore. We have been contemplating using co-knit pads (synthetic fiber inter-woven with a SS fiber), but have not done so yet.
Read more

(2008) Question 1: What are your experiences taking reactor effluent samples? What safety issues do you consider when taking samples? What do you consider to be best practices?

Question 1: What are your experiences taking reactor effluent samples? What safety issues do you consider when taking samples? What do you consider to be best practices? Edwin Yuh (UOP) UOP has traditionally included sampling capability in our licensed units when there are multiple reactor systems. For example, a sample point is typically installed at the pretreat reactor outlet before the cracking reactor in hydrocracking units to measure nitrogen slip. Many UOP licensees collect reactor effluent samples routinely. Quite a few recently licensed units are designed as integrated hydroprocessing units processing different feeds with different catalyst systems.
Read more

(2008) Question 2: Do you re-evaluate your unit operating procedures at regular intervals? How often? What principles/standards are these procedures reviewed against?

Question 2: Do you re-evaluate your unit operating procedures at regular intervals? How often? What principles/standards are these procedures reviewed against? David Rapavi (HOVENSA) HOVENSA reviews and re-issues unit operating procedures in accordance with OSHA Standard 1910.119 paragraph (f)(3), which states “Operating procedures shall be reviewed as often as necessary to assure that they reflect current operating practice, including changes that result from changes in process chemicals, technology and equipment, and changes to facilities.
Read more

(2019) Question 8: Where is salt (NH4Cl or (NH4)2S) fouling most likely to occur? What are common practices for monitoring and mitigating?

ABIGAIL SLATER (HollyFrontier)
Salting typically occurs in the reactor effluent exchangers (shell and tube and fin fans), recycle and net gas compressors, and product stabilizer overhead system (top trays, overhead condenser, etc.). Common monitoring practices on exchangers and fin fans can be

Read more

(2019) Question 9: How do you track chloride in liquid/gas/LPG? What are your criteria for replacing adsorbent in chloride treaters?

DAVINDER MITTAL (HPCL Mittal Energy)
Chlorides have been a long standing issue in catalytic reformer operation. Until a few years ago, the focus on preventing operational problems from the chloride compounds in the catalytic reformer product stream was to remove HCl.  More recently, a growing

Read more

(2019) Question 10: What causes metal-catalyzed coking (MCC) that obstructs catalyst circulation in CCR reformers? What actions do you take to mitigate MCC formation?

BILL KOSTKA (AXENS NORTH AMERICA)
Metal-catalyzed coke (MCC) formation typically occurs on 3d valence transition metals such as iron and nickel.  Under CCR-like conditions of low hydrogen partial pressure (less than about 620 kpa), high temperature (more than about 480 °C) and low or stagnant flow

Read more

(2019) Question 11: Where are your liquid-phase chloride treaters installed for reforming units? What are the advantages of each location?

BILL KOSTKA (AXENS NORTH AMERICA)
Liquid-phase Cl treaters are typically used in three locations for reforming units.

Treating the unstabilzed reformate stream provides several advantages.  The stream is heated upstream of the stabilizer column which ensures that any ammonium chloride is

Read more

(2019) Question 14: What are your strategies to reduce alky acid consumption?

ABIGAIL SLATER (HollyFrontier)
The most impactful parameter affecting alky acid consumption is feed quality. Reducing feed contamination will greatly reduce acid consumption. There are also operational changes that can be made to reduce acid consumption, but the biggest impact will be feed

Read more

(2019) Question 15: What practices and modifications have you implemented in response to the new High Temperature Hydrogen Attack (HTHA) guidelines and updated Nelson curves?

JOE RYDBERG (CITGO)
The primary source document for dealing with High Temperature Hydrogen Attack (HTHA) is API Recommended Practice 941 – Steels for Hydrogen Service at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures in Petroleum Refineries and Petrochemical Plants. This document provides the basic guidelines

Read more

(2019) Question 16: What is required to achieve Safety Integrity Level 2 (SIL-2) rating on the hydrocracker depressuring system? For a hydrotreater that does not require SIL-2, what position should the depressurization valve fail to?

JOE RYDBERG (CITGO)
CITGO typically seeks process safety consultants to help with SIS design including SIL selection.  Kenexis is such a company who has provided the following technical information regarding depressurization systems.   

There are a multitude of different initiating events (loss of

Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 162
  • Page 163
  • Page 164
  • Page 165
  • Current page 166
  • Page 167
  • Page 168
  • Page 169
  • Page 170
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top