Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD
  • Gasoline Processing
    • (-) Plant Services
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Process
  • Operations
  • Corrosion
  • Mechanical
  • Coker
  • Reliability
  • Crude Quality
  • Vacuum Tower
  • Distillation
  • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
  • Desalting
  • Naphtha Hydrotreating
  • Safety

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD
  • Gasoline Processing
    • (-) Plant Services
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Process
  • Operations
  • Corrosion
  • Mechanical
  • Coker
  • Reliability
  • Crude Quality
  • Vacuum Tower
  • Distillation
  • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
  • Desalting
  • Naphtha Hydrotreating
  • Safety

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2016) Question 28: Our hydrotreating unit continues to suffer from pressure drop issues. Multiple graded-bed schemes have provided incremental improvements. What other successful solutions to further mitigate pressure drop buildup do you employ?

Solving reactor pressure drop issues has been a decades-long ongoing effort, and Haldor Topsoe has been a pioneer within this area since the early 80s when Haldor Topsoe first commercialized highly effective catalytically active grading products.
Read more

(2016) Question 29: What level measurement technology is used in the hydrotreater high-pressureseparator? Is the recommendation different if the unit runs in block modes (with feeds of varying densities)? What design considerations should be taken into account when selecting a high-pressure separator level control valve?

Like any instrumentation, there are advantages and disadvantages for different types of instrumentation in almost any service; therefore, there is no single choice of a Best Practice in all situations. Experiences vary from refiner to refiner, and even sometimes from unit to unit within a refinery depending on many factors, both technical and non-technical. It is important to understand the choices within both contexts. As the non-technical factors –such as instrument technician experience, refinery standards, etc. –are too general, they will not be addressed directly.
Read more

(2016) Question 30: What technologies do you use for mild hydrocracking of heavy gas oil over a range of conversions and product selectivity? Please elaborate on commercial experiences.

The theory and key considerations in utilizing mild hydrocracking (MHC) in an FCCPT unit were covered very thoroughly in Question 77 in the 2009 Answer Book, so I will not repeat what I consider to be the basic background information. Instead, I will try to compare the actual results achieved commercially from the various options. Several different technologies are available, and I will only highlight the keys.
Read more

(2016) Question 10: What strategies do you employ to meet cycle-length targets in naphtha hydrotreaters that are reaching catalyst activity limits due to capacity increases or feedstock quality decreases?

To increase cycle length on an NHT hydrotreater, the refinery needs to understand the contaminants that the reactor must handle and optimize the bed loading to maximize cycle length, as well as have the ability to handle the contaminant.
Read more

(2016) Question 31: With heavy gas oil hydrotreating and mild hydrocracking units producing diesel product with 30 to 50 ppm sulfur, what options do you employ to recover maximum volume of ULSD? Are there other diesel quality concerns, and how are they resolved? How does the yield and quality change over the cycle?

We have many customer examples of FCCPT units and mild hydrocracking (MHC) units directly producing on-spec ULSD with Criterion catalyst systems. Many refiners who are making 30 to 50 ppm sulfur diesel from hydrotreating and/or mild hydrocracking units are able to blend this into the diesel pool and still have the whole pool meet the less than 15 ppm diesel sulfur specification.
Read more

(2016) Question 35: What are possible causes do you see of high product nitrogen in a naphtha hydrotreater processing coker naphtha? Please include monitoring, identification, and troubleshooting techniques, inside and outside battery limit considerations, and mitigation options.

Daily monitoring of feed nitrogen and distillation, via the Sim Dist (simulated distillation) method, will allow the refiner to adjust reactor temperature or control the final boiling point to meet the desired product nitrogen.
Read more

(2016) Question 36: Which refinery water sources do you accept for hydrotreater water wash (e.g., stripped fractionator overhead water, stripper sour water, etc.)? What are typical water quality guidelines?

Water wash systems must be designed well, with good water contact and draining, or the wash can create significant corrosion concerns, potentially resulting in process safety incidents. MPC experienced this first-hand with an intermittent wash system on an NHT unit.
Read more

(2016) Question 38: What do you see for the future of ebullated bed technology considering changes in crude quality and availability?

With the worldwide requirement for higher conversion of residue into lighter, more valuable transportation fuels such as diesel remaining firmly in place, we very much see ebullated-bed (EB) residue hydrocracking building on its current trend as a bottom-of-the-barrel upgrading technology of choice going forward. Investment in this commercially proven, well-established technology is a way to increase complexity and ensure long-term survival in an increasingly volatile marketplace.
Read more

(2016) Question 39: Please summarize the current status of slurry hydrocracking technology commercialization.

Slurry hydrocracking technology has been commercialized in China (VCC) and Italy (EST) in the past two to three years. Both facilities have demonstrated expected performance, including conversion and selectivity. The reliability of slurry hydrocracking is still an open question as these units have only been in operation for a short time. Additional VCC commercial units are scheduled for startup in the next 12 months.
Read more

(2016) Question 40: As it relates to overall catalyst cycle life management, please address the following issues: What are typical cascading practices for catalyst reuse after regeneration and eventual disposal that you employ? What quality control, catalyst properties and performance specifications, and/or warranties do you have in place for regenerated catalysts? What are some of the key decision criteria you use in determining whether to send a catalyst for metals reclamation, r

First, a response to the question: What are typical cascading practices that you employ for catalyst reuse after regeneration and eventual disposal? As the leading catalyst regenerator, Eurecat sees NiMo and CoMo hydrotreated catalysts (regenerated and regenerated plus rejuvenation) in ULSD, jet, kerosene, naphtha, and gas oil hydrotreating units.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Current page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top