Q&A

(2015) Question 87: What has been your experience with gas and/or catalyst bypassing behind monolithic refractory linings? What are the possible approaches to prevent or correct this issue?

Most refractory problems are often due to poor installation and cyclic service. Hot spots are observed in the shell due to major refractory failure; but much more commonly, from the circulation behind the refractory. We have experienced gas and catalyst going behind the monolithic refractory lining. In such cases, hot gases are driven through the refractory by the head of the catalyst just above the entry point. The gas then exits from the dilute phase at the lower pressure zone. As the gas continues to travel through cracks and heats up the metal, the metal tries to expand while the refractory does not expand, which leads to refractory failure.

(2015) Question 88: Describe your approach to repair and improvement (i.e., materials, design, installation, and anchors) to areas that have seen repeated refractory failures.

Speaking of the improper refractory repair, especially in a hot-wall refractory with the coking service, low alloy base metal requires a 300°F preheat along with removal of all sulfides on the metal surface. If you do not do this, you will get weak and brittle welds that will crack easily because of their low weld strength. And therefore, your anchors will break off and your refractory will fail due to the coke growth behind the refractory.

(2015) Question 89: For an equipment revamp/replacement, what are the factors you consider when choosing between hot-wall and cold-wall refractory design, including advantages and disadvantages of each?

Shell has experience with both cold-wall and hot-wall refractory designs for reactors and stripper vessels, but regenerator vessels are always cold-wall refractory designs. Depending on the reactor and stripper vessel, refractory type and standpipes, liftpots, and external portions of the riser can be either cold-wall or hot-wall designs.

(2015) Question 90: We are planning to purchase a new flue gas steam generator. What is your preferred configuration? What are the critical operating parameters you employ to ensure reliable operation? What is your sparing philosophy?

The configuration of the flue gas steam generator will be predominantly governed by FCC design. For a partial-combustion unit, it will be a CO boiler or a CO incinerator cum FGC (flue gas cooler) combination. For complete combustion, it will be a FGC or waste heat boiler alone. By CO boiler, typically we mean a boiler where the steam generating tubes are exposed to direct flame.

(2015) Question 91: What are your top three causes of unit slowdowns, and what is the loss in onstream factor for each? Please provide the same information for your top three causes of unit shutdowns.

FCC/RFCC units are the one of the major secondary units in almost all of IOCL’s refineries. Irrespective of demand positions, these units are always required to operate at high capacities. All of our refineries had been participating in the benchmarking surveys conducted by Solomon Associates, and the results comparing IOCL FCC units with rest of the world (2014 study) are indicated below.

(2013) Question 77: What are the consequences associated with continuing to operate the FCC without main fractionator bottoms cooling circulation?

We considered this question as three parts: What is the action to follow in the event of a loss of bottoms’ cooling? What is the consequence if you lose the net slurry product? What are the operational possibilities if you have a well-planned outage of the slurry circuit? In situations one and two where you have lost circulation or you have lost the net bottoms’ product in the system here, we expect that you would shut down the unit consistent with your licensure’s emergency shutdown procedures.

(2013) Question 78: What procedures (maintenance and operational) are being used to minimize risk when swinging the blind between the reactor/main fractionator?

There are two scenarios to consider: shutdown and startup. I will address the shutdown scenario first. For the shutdown scenario, catalyst is de-inventoried from the reactor and regenerator systems, and the main column and reactor are cooled down to 350°F. There are certain operational conditions that must be satisfied before the blind is installed.

(2013) Question 79: How do you mitigate the risk of falling coke deposits from the reactor plenum chamber and vapor line during initial vessel entry?

We have not had the experience of falling coke deposits on vessel entry. We usually experience difficulty in removing the coke deposits, and we do this by mechanical means. Prior to entry into the reactor, a visual inspection is made from the manway. It is typical to see stalactites from the reactor plenum.

(2013) Question 80: We have coke deposits in the plenum chamber and vapor line and are concerned the deposits may spall off or ignite during refractory dryout. What precautions should be taken to avoid re-igniting these coke deposits during the dryout?

We prevent hot air from entering into the reactor system during the regenerator dryout. Subsequently, we will use initial catalyst circulation for the reactor side dryout. Prior to lighting the DFAH (direct fire air heater) for the regenerator refractory dryout, we will introduce dry steam into the reactor, feed distributors, reactor riser, reactor dome, and stripper section.

(2013) Question 81: How do CO (carbon monoxide) and NOx (nitrogen oxide) emissions change when you operate at low regenerator temperatures? What can be done to mitigate any increases?

I will initially address this question from a CO standpoint and then discuss the NOx. CO emissions typically increase if the regenerator falls below a certain temperature threshold. That temperature threshold will vary based on your regenerator configuration and definitely on the type of air distribution.

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

Q&A