Question 57: How are you optimizing the use of wet gas scrubbers caustic use and SOx additives?
TIFFANY CLARK (BASF)
You can utilize a SOx additive in addition to a Wet Gas Scrubber system in order to reduce caustic consumption and minimize cost. Utilizing a SOx additive can be optimized by calculating the caustic savings + value of additional liquid sulfur produced - the cost of the Sox additive. As you can see in this graph, the value of SOx additive can be calculated for varying caustic costs and SOx reduction percentages and should generate a curve like is shown here with the optimum at the top of the curve. In addition, it is worth noting that pickup rate is dependent on SOx concentration. Higher SOx concentration means higher pick-up rate.
DEWEY STUART (Motiva Enterprises)
This is managed with cost benefit analysis depending on market cost of the two and downstream processing cost and limitations. As you switch from caustic to SOx additives the amount of H2S treatment in the FCCU overhead increases. This can lead to additional loads on the Scrubbers and potential pH shifts on the water treatment systems. If the capacity if not available in the downstream treatment, then the remaining H2S in the system can exceed limitations for the receiving units possibly including downstream fired heaters. If the water treatment sections do not have pH control and typically run basic (generally and issue on units running more hydrotreated feeds) the corrosion mechanisms can shift. Some mechanisms to consider are acid corrosion, wet H2S, Ammonium Bisulfide, Ammonium Chloride, Carbonate Cracking, and CO2 Corrosion. Depending on the individual systems the approach for control will very.
JARRED DREWRY (Johnson Matthey)
In response to escalating caustic prices, at least 10 refineries in the US alone have begun using SOx reduction additives in their FCCs to reduce caustic use. A moderate amount of SOx additive (50-300 lb/d) can substantially reduce the required caustic 30-60%, particularly in full burn units. Overall savings range from $100,000 to more than $1 million annually. There may also be other refinery advantages such as reduced waste water treatment.
STEVE GREMILLION (W.R. Grace & Co.)
SOx emission control continues to be an important topic for many refiners, particularly in regions and countries where more stringent environmental emission targets will come into effect. Two of the most common approaches utilized by refiners for complying with SOx emission targets are the use of wet gas scrubbers (WGS) and the application of FCC SOx reduction additives. While WGS’s are typically very effective for SOx control, they can result in high OPEX costs, particularly those associated with caustic soda price. A recent analysis of the US market shows that more than 50% of refiners operating WGS’s are also using SOx reduction additives to optimize WGS caustic usage.
Over the past two years, global caustic pricing has increased considerably. Figure 1 highlights caustic pricing in various regions of the US and EMEA. While the pricing varies by region, a consistent increase in caustic price has been observed over the last two years in all regions. This increase in caustic pricing has a significant impact on OPEX costs for refineries operating a WGS and provides economic incentive for the optimization of WGS caustic usage via the application of SOx reduction additives.
![](/sites/default/files/inline-images/question%2057%2C%20figure%201%20%282018%29_0.jpg)
Figure 1 – Caustic Soda Market Pricing
Because SOx reduction additives are a well-established method of reducing FCC SOx emissions, it is possible to make an accurate estimation of the potential cost savings associated with using an optimum combination of WGS caustic and SOx reduction additive to meet SOx emission limits.
Key factors affecting the available cost savings are the uncontrolled SOx emissions (i.e. the SOx level that would be obtained without the use of any SOx reduction technology), targeted SOx emission level, caustic soda pricing, SOx reduction additive performance, and SOx additive price.
Figure 2 shows an example of the daily OPEX cost of using SOx reduction additive compared to WGS caustic to control SOx emissions.
![](/sites/default/files/inline-images/question%2057%2C%20figure%202%20%282018%29_0.jpg)
Figure 2 – OPEX Comparison Example
SOx reduction additive performance is typically represented by the PUF (lbs SOx removed/ lbs of additive). Observed PUF is unit specific and varies significantly across industry due to differences in regenerator operating conditions and regeneration kinetics, target SOx removal percentage, and specific additive type.
It is also important to note that PUF decreases as the percentage of SOx reduction increases. Due to this fact, there is a breakeven point where the additive cost and the caustic cost have the same OPEX. This is shown in Figure 2 when the additive cost (green line) and the caustic cost (blue line) intersect. Using additive to obtain a level of SOx reduction anywhere to the left of the breakeven point will reduce operating cost. Maximum OPEX reduction is achieved when using SOx reduction additive at the point where the distance between the two lines is greatest and then using WGS caustic to obtain additional SOx reduction beyond that point.
Based on these factors, it is very important for the refinery to work closely with their additive supplier to develop an accurate economic evaluation to understand where this breakeven point is for their specific operation and determine the optimum combination of caustic use in the WGS and SOx reduction additives for meeting SOx emission targets.
Pre-Conference Workshop: Human Organizational Performance: Developing Learning Teams
Bob Edwards, Human Organization Performance Consultant, The HOP Coach
Representative, Flint Hills Resources
Representative, LyondellBasell
Representative, Phillips 66
This pre-conference workshop will be a combination of presentations with Bob Edwards as well as operating companies that have implemented learning teams within their organizations followed by a roundtable discussion. *Speakers to be announced in the spring*
Breakout Sessions (repeated)
Track: Process Safety
Sponsored by the AFPM Process Safety Regional Networks
Identifying & Managing Process Safety Risks
Richard Evanston, Cheniere Energy
Getting off the Mechanical Integrity Island
Ken Min & Alyse Keller, AcuTech Group, Inc
Track: Innovation Award Winners: Process Safety
Award winners to be announced early 2023
Track: Human Performance
Speakers to be announced early 2023
Track: Contractors
Daily Safety Commercials for the Short Service Employee
Sean Benoit, Clean Harbors/HPC Industrial
Clearing Procedural Compliance Hurdles
Michael Wood, TEAM Industrial Services
Track: Industrial Hygiene
Achieving IH success through Collaboration and Employee Engagement
Tyler Jackson, Phillips 66
Justin Mecham, Valero
Regulatory Panel Discussion: OSHA HEAT Stress NEP and TSCA
Speakers to be announced early 2023
Breakout Sessions (repeated)
Track: Process Safety
Sponsored by the AFPM Process Safety Regional Networks
Identifying & Managing Process Safety Risks
Richard Evanston, Cheniere Energy
Getting off the Mechanical Integrity Island
Ken Min & Alyse Keller, AcuTech Group, Inc
Track: Innovation Award Winners: Process Safety
*Award winners to be announced early 2023*
Track: Human Performance
*Speakers to be announced early 2023*
Track: Contractors
Daily Safety Commercials for the Short Service Employee
Sean Benoit, Clean Harbors/HPC Industrial
Clearing Procedural Compliance Hurdles
Michael Wood, TEAM Industrial Services
Track: Industrial Hygiene
Achieving IH success through Collaboration and Employee Engagement
Tyler Jackson, Phillips 66
Justin Mecham, Valero
Regulatory Panel Discussion: OSHA HEAT Stress NEP and TSCA
*Speakers to be announced early 2023*
Andy Bochman
Cyber Security--Developing Regulations, Initiatives and Working Together
Join us for a session discussing three relevant topics covering both the cyber-physical security world for asset owner operators. The need for increased collaboration within AFPM community members, the current and future regulatory requirements, and soooo many new initiatives that albeit are in good faith, which and what matters.
What do Future Threats Look Like?--Climate Change, Drones and More!
The world is a crazy place and the security challenges critical infrastructure face are more challenging than ever. This session will discuss a couple of hot topics that may greatly affect site security in the future.
General Session
Chairman's Welcome - Jeff Ramsey, President & CEO Flint Hills Resources LLC, AFPM Chairman of the Board
President's Report - Chet Thompson, President & CEO, AFPM
The Causes and Consequences of the Russia-Ukraine War - Michael McFaul, U.S. Ambassador to the Russian Federation (2012-2014); Stanford Professor and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow; Washington Post Columnist; NBC News Analyst
Join Michael McFaul as he first explains the drivers of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s decision to invade Ukraine. He then assess the results of the war so far, speculates about how it might end, and explains why we should care. To answer these questions, McFaul combines analytic and historical insights from his thirty years of academic research and government experience on Russia, Ukraine, and the United States with unique insights from his personal interactions with Russian President Putin, Ukrainian President Zelensky, and U.S. President Biden.
China and the USA: How the 21st Century Unfolds - Admiral James Stavridis is Vice Chair, Global Affairs of The Carlyle Group and Chair of the Board of Trustees, Rockefeller Foundation.
Admiral Stavridis, an expert on China who spent over half his career in the Pacific Fleet, takes the audience through the history and culture of China and describes how the US and China have emerged as the two crucial superpowers of the 21st century. He describes the ongoing conflict between the nations in trade, tariffs, intellectual property, global influence, and the “hotspot” of the South China Sea. The Admiral then lays out a prescription for avoiding a conflict with China in the decades ahead, with predictions of the evolution of the global landscape as it will be influenced by the US-China relationship. A must-see experience to understand the big issues ahead for the world.
Women In Industry Event
Reflective Leadership: The Sacrifices & Success in Leadership
Being a good leader is not all sunshine and rainbows. Come learn the keys to what every leader should know about how to lead through the growing pains that come with success.