Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2013) Question 80: We have coke deposits in the plenum chamber and vapor line and are concerned the deposits may spall off or ignite during refractory dryout. What precautions should be taken to avoid re-igniting these coke deposits during the dryout?

We prevent hot air from entering into the reactor system during the regenerator dryout. Subsequently, we will use initial catalyst circulation for the reactor side dryout. Prior to lighting the DFAH (direct fire air heater) for the regenerator refractory dryout, we will introduce dry steam into the reactor, feed distributors, reactor riser, reactor dome, and stripper section.
Read more

(2013) Question 81: How do CO (carbon monoxide) and NOx (nitrogen oxide) emissions change when you operate at low regenerator temperatures? What can be done to mitigate any increases?

I will initially address this question from a CO standpoint and then discuss the NOx. CO emissions typically increase if the regenerator falls below a certain temperature threshold. That temperature threshold will vary based on your regenerator configuration and definitely on the type of air distribution.
Read more

(2013) Question 82: For those operating units with electrostatic precipitators (ESPs), share your experience with using SOx (sulfur oxide) reduction additives and their impact on: 1) ESP performance, 2) stack opacity, and 3) filterable solids mass.

We have two ESPs in our system. One of them is on a unit currently using less than 2.0% of SOx additive. We have not seen any impact at all on performance, opacity, or filterable solids. The other ESP went through a retrofit within the past four years, going from a smaller, older version of an ESP to a larger ESP with more modern technology.
Read more

(2013) Question 83: Wet flue gas scrubber NOx removal technology often results in excessive nitrates in the purge water. What are refiners doing to limit nitrates going to their wastewater treatment plant?

Nitrates and nitrites are inevitable byproducts from the removal of NOx from FCC flue gas. Obviously, one way to lower this nitrate concentration going into the purge water is to reduce the NOx in the flue gas, which we discussed a couple of questions ago.
Read more

(2013) Question 84: What are the commercial experiences with low rare earth and zero rare earth SOx reduction additives? What are the incentives to return to traditional products now that rare earth prices have returned to historical levels?

During the run-up in the cost of rare earth in 2011, Grace embarked on an expedited and extensive R&D (research and development) program to develop future generations of our Super DeSOx® additive to cut the rare earth content and try to minimize the financial impact that the ever-increasing cost of rare earth had on our customers’ cost of SOx compliance.
Read more

(2013) Question 85: What are the advantages and disadvantages of catalyst mesoporosity [100 to 600 ǻngström (Å) diameter pores] in VGO (vacuum gas oil) operations?

When talking about catalyst mesoporosity, we are referring to the matrix contribution, especially the 100 to 600 ǻngström pores found in the catalyst matrix activity. Catalyst matrix activity is really important, particularly in the Type I cracking depicted here, in the mix zone of the riser where the mix zone can be on the order of 1100°F.
Read more

(2013) Question 86: What are the advantages and disadvantages of pre-blending FCC additives with FCC catalyst? What is the experience with incorporating FCC additive functionality into the catalyst particles?

Certainly, the obvious advantage of pre-blending additives with your base catalyst is improving your logistics and not handling totes. Another advantage is in not needing an additive loader that you have to maintain. Additionally, pre-blending avoids the possibility of human error in the additive injection process. There are significant drawbacks to doing this as well.
Read more

(2013) Question 87: The operation of a resid FCC can be challenging as more of its feed is hydrotreated to meet ULSG and ULSD specifications. What changes can be made to improve its operation?

For the purpose of this answer, we will look at this as a resid cat cracker that would have a catalyst cooler or be in a two-stage operation. Any increase in feed hydrotreating which increases the portion of hydrotreated feed, or an increase in hydrotreating severity, will obviously improve the feed quality.
Read more

(2013) Question 88: What FCC products are candidates for blending into jet fuel? What are the limitations and considerations?

A review of our clients worldwide did not find any client that was blending any FCC product with just sweetening into jet. Limiting issues would be olefins (gum formation) and aromatic and potentially naphthalene content of unhydrotreated FCC jet boiling range components.
Read more

(2013) Question 89: How are FCC simulation models being used as part of routine performance monitoring and optimization?

At Valero, we have a centralized group in the Planning & Economics area that is responsible for the kinetic modeling for all of the major process units. The primary driver behind the kinetic models at Valero is to get good data into our LP (linear program) models.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 138
  • Page 139
  • Page 140
  • Page 141
  • Current page 142
  • Page 143
  • Page 144
  • Page 145
  • Page 146
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top