Q&A

(2016) Question 12: What operating strategies do you employ to successfully regenerate catalyst in a continuous catalyst regeneration (CCR) unit with a carbon content in excess of 10 wt%?

The burn zone in a Honeywell UOP Platforming™ CCR Regenerator is designed for operation at 5 wt.% carbon on catalyst or about 5.25 wt.% coke at the design catalyst circulation rate. We find that most units can operate normally at coke levels 40% above the design (about 7.4 wt.% coke) and some at even higher levels of coke.

(2016) Question 13: When the regenerator in a CCR unit is shut down for an extended periodof time, how do you predict coke on catalyst with no catalyst circulation?

There are two broad scenarios which might result in the catalyst circulation of a CCR Platforming™ unit being stopped for an extended period of time. The first is that there is maintenance being performed that requires the regenerator to be taken off-line for several days.

(2016) Question 14: Do you have experience with CCR heel catalyst contaminating the circulating inventory during operation? How can this contamination be prevented?

The most common situation that results in the contamination of a catalyst load with heel catalyst occurs during a turnaround as a result of accidentally reloading drums of used catalyst that contain heel catalyst back into the reactors. This type of contamination occurs in one or two units every year.

(2016) Question 15: How do you remove the CCR heel catalyst from the unit during an outage and underwhat atmospheric conditions?

Catalyst unloading from a CCR Platforming™ reactor stack is done under nitrogen atmosphere using the normal catalyst transfer line under the catalyst collector. Typically, the last 10 to 15% of the catalyst unloaded will be contaminated with heel catalyst. This percentage may be higher if there has been damage to internals or blockage of catalyst transfer lines.

(2016) Question 16: What is your Best Practice for inspecting and preventing erosion in CCR lift lines?

In CCR Platforming™ units, the movement of catalyst through the lift pipe results in contact between the catalyst pills and the inner surface of the lift pipe.

(2016) Question 31: With heavy gas oil hydrotreating and mild hydrocracking units producing diesel product with 30 to 50 ppm sulfur, what options do you employ to recover maximum volume of ULSD? Are there other diesel quality concerns, and how are they resolved? How does the yield and quality change over the cycle?

We have many customer examples of FCCPT units and mild hydrocracking (MHC) units directly producing on-spec ULSD with Criterion catalyst systems. Many refiners who are making 30 to 50 ppm sulfur diesel from hydrotreating and/or mild hydrocracking units are able to blend this into the diesel pool and still have the whole pool meet the less than 15 ppm diesel sulfur specification.

(2016) Question 32: What are your current practices and experiences of performing online cleaning of heat exchangers versus offline cleaning?

To achieve a good online cleaning (with the exchanger bypassed by not pulled), it is imperative to have nozzles on the inlet and outlets that are large enough to facilitate the circulation of a heat cleaning solution or steam with a cleaner.

(2016) Question 33: Can you share your experience with chemical additives to prevent fouling in the naphtha hydrotreater feed side of the feed/effluent heat exchangers or resolve reactor pressure drop issues?

The answer is partially the same as the one given to Question 28. First, the root cause needs to be determined. If the dP is caused by corrosion products due to corrosion in the upstream refinery units, the corrosion in these units can be reduced by applying the proper corrosion control program.

(2016) Question 34: The cycle life of a high-pressure ULSD unit operating for maximum aromatic saturation and liquid yield is limited by aromatics equilibrium at elevated temperatures. What strategies or solutions do you employ to extend operation with maximum liquid yield?

This question is more related to EOR conditions when you have employed all of the operational techniques but wish to further optimize the EOR performance without yield decline. If you are already maximizing H2 pp (partial pressure), achieving full catalyst utilization with state-of-the art reactor internals, and adjusting bed profiles at MOR/EOR (middle-of-run/end-of-run) to remain in region of optimum aromatic saturation, the following example illustrates the benefits of optimizing the nickel-molybdenum catalyst for your application.

(2016) Question 35: What are possible causes do you see of high product nitrogen in a naphtha hydrotreater processing coker naphtha? Please include monitoring, identification, and troubleshooting techniques, inside and outside battery limit considerations, and mitigation options.

Daily monitoring of feed nitrogen and distillation, via the Sim Dist (simulated distillation) method, will allow the refiner to adjust reactor temperature or control the final boiling point to meet the desired product nitrogen.

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

Q&A