Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2017) Question 57: Advanced (Closed)-Riser Termination Systems have been around since the 1990s. Explain any technology improvements you have seen based on experience and learnings.

The primary goal of a modern riser termination system which considers the close coupling of the primary and secondary separating devices is the reduction of residence time and, thus, the minimization of undesirable thermal cracking reactions. This post-riser cracking usually translates to dry gas yield at the expensive of other, more valuable products.
Read more

(2017) Question 58: What are your Best Practices for reliably measuring level in the bottom of the main fractionator?

The following tables list the demonstrated technologies to reliably measure main column bottoms (MCB) level. Regardless of the technology used, it is important to have redundant level indication. The Best Practice is to employ two level transmitters with a selector switch for MCB level control. For displacers, guided-wave radar, and dP level transmitters, redundant transmitters should be on independent vessel taps. There are benefits to having two different level technologies employed. For point level measurement, at least two points should be measured for high and low levels.
Read more

(2017) Question 73: Gasoline octanes continue to have a high value for many refineries. What fractionation strategies do you apply to increase gasoline octane? What rules of thumb do you apply for estimating changes in octane with gasoline endpoint adjustments?

RVP and endpoint both have a minor effect on gasoline octane. With other operating parameter changes and repeatability of octane results in the lab (+/- 0.5 RON), it is difficult to quantify small changes in octane caused by fractionation changes. Literature suggests that for every 1.5 psi RVP increase, RON will increase 0.3. We have very little data to support the literature, because the octane and RVP value of mixed C4s is much greater as alkylate than on the frontend of FCC gasoline.
Read more

(2017) Question 74: How do you mitigate aqueous corrosion in the main fractionator overhead and gas concentration unit? What contaminants do you test for in the sour water, and what limits do you impose? What are your concerns with using stripped sour water as waterwash?

Over the last six years, there have been a number of questions related to different aspects of overhead and gas concentration unit corrosion management, including design recommendations. For completion of the Answer Book, here is a brief summary of the topics covered.
Read more

(2017) Question 75: What are your Best Practices in design and operation to achieve positive isolation of slurry/HCO equipment?

Technip’s practice is to specify gate valves with flushing connections at the base of the seat. To ensure positive isolation, the flushing connection can be used to remove any sediments that may be impact the contact of the gate with the seat. Another option is to orient the valve stem off of vertical in order to move the final seating location away from the low point, therefore reducing the chances of sediment to accumulate there.
Read more

(2016) Question 17: What are your strategies for managing feed sulfur to reforming units? What are the pros and cons of the different approaches?

It is desirable to have a small amount of sulfur in the feed for CCR reforming units in order to reduce the risk of metal catalyzed coke (MCC) formation and heater-tube carburization and dusting. The sulfur interacts with the chromium and the iron to form a protective layer that reduces the penetration of carbon into the metal.
Read more

(2016) Question 18: The increased production of light straight-run (LSR) from crude units is likely to have an impact on refiners’plans for Tier 3 compliance. What strategies do you employ in order to manage this issue?

Tier 3 drives hydrotreating of essentially all light naphtha streams. Since most United States refineries have FCCs, it is usually desirable to hydrotreat other gasoline streams more completely to minimize the FCC naphtha olefin saturation and the associated octane loss
Read more

(2016) Question 19: What range of sulfur targets for hydrotreated FCC gasoline do you anticipate for Tier 3 operation?

The sulfur target for hydrotreated FCC gasoline is very site dependent. But where possible, it is desirable to hydrotreat all other gasoline streams fully so that the FCC naphtha can be treated as mildly as possible. Deeper desulfurization for FCC naphtha results in increased olefin saturation with the resultant octane loss.
Read more

(2016) Question 20: When is it appropriate to neutralize austenitic stainless-steel equipment to protect against stress corrosion cracking (SCC)? What neutralization procedures and methodologies do you recommend?

Austenitic stainless steels (200-and 300-series steel) are the most common type of stainless steels. Austenite refers specifically to the geometry of the steel (face-centered cubic crystal). These types of steel are most typically recognized as non-magnetic. Austenitic steels are widely used in the industry because they have very desirable mechanical properties. Their austenitic structure is very tough and ductile down to absolute zero. They also do not lose their strength at elevated temperatures as rapidly as ferritic iron base alloys.
Read more

(2016) Question 21: What programs or systems do you employ to monitor hydrotreater furnaces and prevent tube failures and loss of containment? Can you share your experiences using technologies to implement online temperature monitoring of tube skin temperatures?

In nearly all hydroprocessing heaters, MPC has installed tubeskin thermocouples in order to provide continuous monitoring of tube metal temperatures to the DCS (distributed control system) operator. These thermocouples are strategically located in the heater at the areas with the highest estimated maximum heat flux.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 112
  • Page 113
  • Page 114
  • Page 115
  • Current page 116
  • Page 117
  • Page 118
  • Page 119
  • Page 120
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top