Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Operational Excellence Programs
My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Operational Excellence Programs
    • Safety Portal, Now MyAFPM
    • Alkylation Safety
    • FCC Process Safety Regional Workshops
    • Human & Organizational Performance
    • Walk the Line
    • Walk the Job
    • Q&A Database
    • Safety Statistics and Reports
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • Gasoline Processing
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Feed Quality
  • Crude/Coking
    • Mechanical
    • Process
  • FCC

Year QA

  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
  • (-) 2019
  • (-) 2013
Search Filters

Process

  • Gasoline Processing
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Feed Quality
  • Crude/Coking
    • Mechanical
    • Process
  • FCC

Year QA

  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
  • (-) 2019
  • (-) 2013
Filters

(2013) Question 41: In an effort to increase margins on hydrotreating units, what strategies and/or new technologies are refiners employing to minimize utility usage? What are the economics and reliability of adding a power recovery turbine?

In the IsoTherming® liquid hydrotreating process, there is a substantial reduction in utilities on a unit we just started up with 40% straight-run/60% light cycle oil.
Read more

(2013) Question 42: Occasionally we make off-color jet (pink, blue, or green). What are the causes, and what can be done to correct this?

The question was specific to off-color jet, but we can have other off-color material. We have seen red, yellow, green, and brown. Most typically, the yellow and green tend to be associated with the lighter products, red and brown with the heavier ones. But again, you can get various colors throughout the spectrum.
Read more

(2013) Question 43: Can FCCU feed pre-treatment achieve the new Tier 3 gasoline sulfur targets without post-gasoline treatment? What criteria are used to select the optimal combination of pre-treatment and post-treatment severities to meet the Tier 3 objectives?

For Tier 3 gasoline, the anticipated average of 10 ppm sulfur will be required by 2017. In order to understand what will be needed to meet those specs, you will have to do a review of a number of factors that contribute to the sulfur, including understanding your crude diet and the material that is actually going into the gasoline pool, as well as blend components.
Read more

(2013) Question 44: What are refiner’s practices or procedures to remove catalyst from a reactor when the catalyst will not free flow dump? What is the industry's experience with hydro drilling for removal of non-free-flow catalyst from fixed-bed units?

We typically vacuum out catalyst in an inert atmosphere if the reactors do not free-flow dump. We also wet dump some of our reactors, which involves vacuuming out the catalyst after removing the water. For people who are involved in turnaround planning, unloading rates for free-flowing catalyst are approximately 200 cubic feet of catalyst per hour.
Read more

(2013) Question 45: What are the procedures/rules governing the transportation and disposal of catalyst contaminated with arsenic, mercury, barium, or other heavy metals? Are there maximum limits for any of these?

The spent catalyst needs to be shipped offsite and sent for metals reclamation or disposal. If it is going for disposal, it will have to be characterized to determine if 1) it is a hazardous waste, which it is most of the time, and 2) it meets the applicable Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs). It would have to be treated, as part of disposal, to meet the LDRs.
Read more

(2013) Question 96: What are the typical causes of dipleg plugging/fouling? How can the plugging/fouling be avoided? What is the experience with clearing diplegs online?

I am going to take the question in a few parts. I will cover the reactor side first. In the reactor side, dipleg plugging will generally be due to coke formation that can be subdivided into two categories: the coke formation that occurs either internal to the cyclone or externally. On the gas outlet tube of the cyclone, you will see the stereotypical coke formation on the backside of the gas outlet tube, perhaps from incomplete feed vaporization.
Read more

(2013) Question 97: What operational or design changes can be employed to address heat balance issues – e.g., catalyst circulation limits, low regenerator temperatures –associated with processing tight oil-derived feeds?

This answer will be very similar to what was already discussed about how to treat the resids. The example shown on the slide is a Maya blend, a typical tight oil, and then a tight oil with resid. Again, we are seeing significant reductions in sulfur and Conradson carbon metals and also a much higher hydrogen content.
Read more

(2013) Question 98: What catalyst changes can be made to minimize the negative effects of low delta coke that result from processing increased amounts of tight oil-derived FCC feed?

The schematic on the slide shows the representation of the coke yield and the coke balance from the FCC. Of course, the total overall weight percent coke yield is set by heat balance, but the sources of the coke vary significantly from one feed to the next. Everyone talked thoroughly about how the coke precursors are just not there in these lighter feeds.
Read more

(2013) Question 99: Tight oil-derived FCC feeds are known to contain high levels of contaminant iron (Fe) and calcium (Ca). What catalyst design features are important for minimizing their effects? What level of these contaminants can be tolerated? What lab procedures can accurately simulate Fe and Ca contamination?

There are a lot of parts to this question, so I will respond to them independently. One of the catalyst design features that is important in any kind of feed, when you are going to get high iron and high calcium, is in the porosity. We talked a little before about how these contaminant metals tend to form these eutectics which can melt the surface of the catalyst and close off the pores.
Read more

(2013) Question 100: What specific changes in yields and product qualities might be expected when processing large percentages of tight oil-derived feeds? What operational changes can be made to address any problems created by these effects?

We are currently running varying degrees of tight oil at the majority or our refineries. At the refineries that are running a larger percentage of tight oil, the largest field impacts we have identified have been the shift to lighter products. At the same time, it insignificantly increased volume gains and significantly decreased slurry yield.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Current page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2026 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top