Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • Crude/Coking
    • Operations
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Corrosion
    • Crude Quality
    • Desalting
    • Safety
    • Vacuum Tower
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Safety
    • Plant Services
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
  • (-) 2018
  • (-) 2013
Search Filters

Process

  • Crude/Coking
    • Operations
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Corrosion
    • Crude Quality
    • Desalting
    • Safety
    • Vacuum Tower
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Safety
    • Plant Services
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
  • (-) 2018
  • (-) 2013
Filters

(2013) Question 62: What criteria are used to evaluate the performance of crude pre-heat train exchangers to support a decision to clean any portion?

It is essential to keep crude pre-heat exchangers clean. Cleaning benefits are hard to justify if they negatively affect crude rate. The criteria we use are crude hydraulic throughput, heater firing limits, fuel gas savings, desalter temperature efficiency, or crude or vacuum tower heat balance if you have needs in that area to remove heat.
Read more

(2013) Question 63: How are refiners monitoring and controlling the efficiency of fired heaters? Are adjustments made to fuel gas composition to improve heater performance?

At CITGO, we utilize both daily monitoring tools and weekly programs to rank the heaters based on performance and missed opportunity. Optimization targets get set based upon best efficiency points, and the consoles are expected to be at these optimization points.
Read more

(2013) Question 64: How do you select the proper metallurgy for crude overhead (OVHD) to increase reliability?

Our belief is that a proper design includes a good waterwash system and less expensive metallurgy. Our tower tops are typically carbon steel with Monel overlay.
Read more

(2013) Question 65: Please share experiences in crude tower fouling from organic and/or phosphorous-containing deposits.

We have experience with two types of organic tower fouling. The first was an organic fouling in the top portion of the tower due to rerunning cracked slop oil, coker naphtha, and kerosene material. Typically, we do not want to do that. Since then, we have stopped processing those materials or limited the amount that we are rerunning so it does not happen anymore.
Read more

(2013) Question 30: What are your design practices for reactor skin thermocouple requirements in a hydrotreater and a hydrocracker for startups and safe operation?

Our minimal requirement for a hydrotreater is three skin thermocouples at the top and bottom heads of the reactors and a full skin thermocouple at the bottom shell of the reactor just about at the tangent line. The option now is a full skin thermocouple at the top of the shell and the middle of the shell.
Read more

(2013) Question 31: What is the threshold concentration of arsenic and phosphorus requiring a dedicated trap system? How are the arsenic and phosphorus trap systems specified,and what are the controlling mechanisms?

Arsenic is a big concern because it is a permanent poison that causes fairly significant activity. We generally see around a 60° Floss per weight percent pickup; so, you will want to pay attention to it. As a side note, it is also common in most fractions of hydrotreating: so anything from naphtha to heavy gas oil.
Read more

(2013) Question 32: What is a typical range of HDM (hydrodemetallization; metals removal) in a gas oil hydrotreater? Can HDM decline rapidly when metals in the feed become excessive relative to catalyst system design? Is there a point when metals in the feed are so high that they “overwhelm” the demet (demetallization) and main bed catalyst, resulting in lower percent of HDM?

Nickel and vanadium contamination generally come in heavy gas oils and resid hydrotreating. It is obviously not very common in diesels and light feeds. We see that it is about a 5°F to 9°F loss per weight percent combined pickup. The reason you will want to pay attention to these metals is because of their ability to actually diffuse onto the catalyst, so you will need a space to deposit them.
Read more

(2013) Question 33: What is the philosophy or criteria for optimizing catalyst bed grading material to prevent high reactor pressure drop from feed containing significant amounts of Fe (iron)?

Certainly, identifying the sources of the iron coming in – whether organic, iron oxides, iron sulfides, or just scale from tanks – is very critical to understanding your best strategy for mitigating pressure drop. Ultimately, when you form iron sulfide, it creates deposits on the bed and coke deposition, and certainly leads to reduced catalyst life.
Read more

(2013) Question 34: When processing cracked naphtha, what is done to ensure that polymerization of the diolefins/olefins will not result in pressure drop problems in a reactor or upstream equipment?

Again, we are trying to prevent the polymerization of the olefin/diolefin. The primary concern is trying to prevent contact with oxygen because that will ultimately lead to gum formation. So, the preference would be, if possible, to feed this hot to all the downstream units and avoid intermediate storage.
Read more

(2013) Question 35: When processing tight oil crudes, are lower bed pressure drop problems in VGO/resid hydrotreater reactors a concern? If so, what mechanisms explain this issue?

The highly paraffinic nature of the tight crudes and the destabilization of asphaltene molecules can cause precipitation and agglomeration. One of our customers with a gas oil mild hydrocracker switched feedstock to increase amounts of black wax crude. This was a five-reactor system.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Current page 24
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top