Q&A

(2010) Question 85: What is the typical range that you employ for iron content on FCC equilibrium catalyst? What methods are available to determine how iron is accumulated on the catalyst surface? How does the distribution of iron on the catalyst surface impact the FCC operation, yield structure and emissions?

There are several methods available to quantify iron contamination on catalyst. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) pictures are a valuable means to qualitatively assess iron laydown morphology on the catalyst particle.

(2010) Question 88: What options exist for the disposition of FCC equilibrium catalyst and fines? For refineries processing residual feedstocks, what are the limitations on the contaminate levels for the various disposal options?

E-cat and ESP hopper fines are either send to a cement kiln or land filled. Fines captured by the Wet Gas Scrubber are also land filled. Metals limits are normally for leachable metals as measured by the TCLP (Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure) testing, as opposed to total metals in the catalyst.

(2010) Question 89: In shifting from partial burn to full burn in a side by side unit, what has been your observed impact on the NOx emissions? What is necessary to achieve 20 ppm NOx?

Several Grace customers successfully operate with NOx emissions less than 20 ppm in full combustion without the use of NOx removal hardware in the flue gas circuit.

(2010) Question 90: Does any refiner use an on-line particulate emissions (PM) analyzer to measure PM concentration and/or particle size distribution in the flue gas? Are any of these analyzers using continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS)? How reliable and accurate have these systems been?

Sunoco currently has a particulate matter (PM) analyzer in one location on the stack of a Wet Gas Scrubber. It is there to measure Filterable PM only, not particle size distribution. This was installed as a requirement of a local environmental permit.

(2010) Question 91: Assuming the FCCU already has a third stage separator, what are the various options you consider for further reduction of particulate emissions (PM) and what is the expected level of PM to be achieved?

The first thing to consider is the fourth stage collector. For designs that re-introduce the collected fines downstream of the expander, a fourth stage collector with fines removal and filter on the TSS underflow gas will aid in reducing PM.

(2019) Question 35: What is the importance of sodium to reliability in the coker? What are some of the potential sources of the sodium in coker feed? In light of IMO how should sodium be managed in purchased coker feed?

Sodium in the coker feed can be introduced via sodium content of the salts in crude, caustic addition at the crude unit for corrosion control purposes, as a contaminant in recovered oil material in the refinery, sodium content of other purchased feedstocks (as mentioned in the question) among others.

(2019) Question 44: What is your recommended back up options for slide valve / plug valve Hydraulic Power Units? Are electric actuators an option? What are the response times?

What is your recommended back up options for slide valve / plug valve Hydraulic Power Units? Are electric actuators an option? What are the response times?

(2019) Question 45: What are your options to maximize light cycle oil from the FCCU (e.g. operating conditions, feedstock, recycle, equipment, catalyst, etc.)?  What are the typical unit constraints?  What projects have been considered at your facility to capture the increased value of diesel?

There are multiple ways to maximize light cycle oil from the FCC including reducing conversion, reformulating the fresh catalyst, utilizing additives, and adjusting fractionation.

(2019) Question 46: How often do you perform steam optimization in the FCC reactor? What process response and benefits do you typically see from performing "step tests" to feed nozzle, lift, and stripping steam flow rates?

How often do you perform steam optimization in the FCC reactor? What process response and benefits do you typically see from performing "step tests" to feed nozzle, lift, and stripping steam flow rates?

(2019) Question 47: For units not challenged by standpipe fluidization, are there benefits to reducing fresh catalyst 0-40 um particle content?

There are multiple benefits to reducing fresh catalyst 0–40-micron particle content for FCCs not challenged by fluidization. A significant portion of the 0-40 content cannot be retained in the FCC.

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

Q&A