Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • (-) Coker
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • (-) Coker
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2011) Question 40: Are there instances where mercaptan treatment of refinery gasoline or naphtha streams is necessary? What are the applicable treatment methods?

As mercaptans are sulfur-bearing compounds, they are one among numerous target species for sulfur removal from naphtha or gasoline streams to meet reactor feed or finished product sulfur specifications.
Read more

(2011) Question 41: What is your best method for detecting nitrogen levels in reformer feeds? How effective is naphtha hydrotreating in reducing nitrogen levels?

Nitrogen in naphtha feedstock can be detected using analyzers based on pyro chemiluminescence or electrochemical measurement. Pyro chemiluminescence-based analyzers appear to be more prevalent in the industry and can detect nitrogen levels over a wide range (from ppb levels to several hundred ppm) in a matter of minutes. ASTM D4629 is a standard test method for trace nitrogen detection in liquids based on pyro chemiluminescence.
Read more

(2011) Question 42: Are you adding hydroxyl generating compounds (methanol or other alcohols) to the chlorination zone of the continuous catalytic regeneration section of their reforming unit? What are the observed results of this procedure?

Whether or not methanol or another hydroxyl in injected into the oxy-Chlorination zone is based on the design of the regenerator. UOP designed units do not inject hydroxyls into the oxy-Chlorination zone, UOP recommends you contact the process Licensor before making any alternations to the Regeneration Tower flows or controls.
Read more

(2011) Question 43: In order to meet RMACT 2 regulations for reducing regenerator vent gas HCl and Total Organic Carbon, some refiners use caustic scrubber vent gas wash tower systems for treating the regenerator vent gas. What has been your experience with respect to corrosion problems? Which equipment (Venturi scrubber, wash tower) and piping have corroded more often? What changes have been made in procedure and/or metallurgy to minimize corrosion?

We have three CCRs with vent gas scrubbers; all are carbon steel, and all have experienced corrosion problems.
Read more

(2011) Question 44: What are the operating parameters, including water or chloride additions, to adjust and monitor on a continuous catalytic regeneration reforming unit when it is required to operate for a short period of time (hours/days) with the regeneration section shut down (for instance if operating in low-coke mode)?

We have four CCR/Platformers in our refineries. While two operates for gasoline production, one operates in mix mode i.e., for BT as well as for gasoline production. The other solely operates for para-xylene production.
Read more

(2011) Question 45: What tools are you using to predict the yields of Xylene, Benzene, Toluene and other aromatics in a catalytic reformer? What methods do you use and how often do you test the feedstock for these variables? Other than feedstock quality, what factors are you accounting for in the individual yields (unit pressure, RON, etc)? Do you have any rules of thumb for conversion of certain species of aromatics?

Dedicated simulators are run for prediction, either using correlations or kinetic models. To be able to perform accurate predictions, feed analyses shall be performed every time the feedstock quality is changed: the most important one is detailed hydrocarbon analysis by gas chromatography (for instance Carburane).
Read more

(2011) Question 46: Ethanol blending, and benzene management has shifted refinery octane and hydrogen balances. How are you managing hydrogen demand without giving away octane? Conversely, how are you, with excess hydrogen, maximizing availability for volume swell?

Mandated ethanol blending and limits on benzene in gasoline tend to lower the ceiling on the operating severity of catalytic reformers. While lower severity operation is theoretically desirable, in practice it can constrain H2 production, and impact regenerator operation due to lower coke make, which may require operational workarounds.
Read more

(2011) Question 47: What success have you had with installing stabilizer feed chloride treaters in reducing the salt formation and frequency of water washes?

The use of promoted alumina versus zeolite in the liquid chloride treating has several issues. For aromatics operations a Zeolite chloride treater should be selected to protect the downstream aromatics solvent from organic and inorganic chloride.
Read more

(2011) Question 48: How does naphtha derived from tar sands and shale oil differ in respect to crude oil-based naphtha? What is the impact on reformer operation?

It is assumed that “shale oil” as mentioned in the question refers to oil produced from hydraulic fracturing of shale reservoirs, as opposed to oil produced from “oil shale” rock via retorting or other techniques.
Read more

(2016) Question 17: What are your strategies for managing feed sulfur to reforming units? What are the pros and cons of the different approaches?

It is desirable to have a small amount of sulfur in the feed for CCR reforming units in order to reduce the risk of metal catalyzed coke (MCC) formation and heater-tube carburization and dusting. The sulfur interacts with the chromium and the iron to form a protective layer that reduces the penetration of carbon into the metal.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Current page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Page 36
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top