Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • (-) Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Vendor
  • Consultant

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • (-) Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Vendor
  • Consultant

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2017) Question 46: What is your design service life of atmospheric tower overhead heat exchangers? How does that compare to actual service life? What do you do to better manage corrosion and improve reliability of these heat exchangers?

Heat exchangers are designed for heat recovery and only rarely for corrosion control. The designer’s tool for reliability is to use upgraded materials of construction. Over the years, those on our team have seen even Hastelloy C276 and titanium being used.
Read more

(2017) Question 47: What correlations do you use to predict cracked gas make in a vacuum tower from atmospheric tower bottoms based on feedstock properties and heater outlet temperature?

In the past, vacuum towers’ flash zones have operating at or below atmospheric tower flash zone temperatures. These units relied on the vacuum to increase heavy gasoil yields from the atmospheric resid without running the risk of thermal cracking associated with higher temperatures.
Read more

(2017) Question 48: What are your design and operating guidelines for vacuum tower bottoms versus crude heat exchangers such as minimum velocities, fouling rates, and pressure drop, and which process fluid should be on the tube side versus the shell side?

KPE believes the typical design for a vacuum bottom versus crude exchanger is for the crude to be on the tube side and the vacuum bottoms to be on the shell side. Most facilities I see have this setup as weli.
Read more

(2017) Question 49: How do you use today’s Advanced Process Control (APC) technology to achieve crude unit operation that supports short-and long-term planning goals? How do you achieve alignment between the crude unit APC and those of downstream units?

Without proper resources and attention, Advanced Process Control (APC) technology may experience inconsistencies as applied to crude units. Refineries where crude slate varies frequently may struggle capturing the value that APC provides for steady controls and optimization. Mode-based APC may be applicable, but irregularities in crude compositions may still provide hurdles.
Read more

(2016) Question 17: What are your strategies for managing feed sulfur to reforming units? What are the pros and cons of the different approaches?

It is desirable to have a small amount of sulfur in the feed for CCR reforming units in order to reduce the risk of metal catalyzed coke (MCC) formation and heater-tube carburization and dusting. The sulfur interacts with the chromium and the iron to form a protective layer that reduces the penetration of carbon into the metal.
Read more

(2016) Question 18: The increased production of light straight-run (LSR) from crude units is likely to have an impact on refiners’plans for Tier 3 compliance. What strategies do you employ in order to manage this issue?

Tier 3 drives hydrotreating of essentially all light naphtha streams. Since most United States refineries have FCCs, it is usually desirable to hydrotreat other gasoline streams more completely to minimize the FCC naphtha olefin saturation and the associated octane loss
Read more

(2016) Question 19: What range of sulfur targets for hydrotreated FCC gasoline do you anticipate for Tier 3 operation?

The sulfur target for hydrotreated FCC gasoline is very site dependent. But where possible, it is desirable to hydrotreat all other gasoline streams fully so that the FCC naphtha can be treated as mildly as possible. Deeper desulfurization for FCC naphtha results in increased olefin saturation with the resultant octane loss.
Read more

(2016) Question 20: When is it appropriate to neutralize austenitic stainless-steel equipment to protect against stress corrosion cracking (SCC)? What neutralization procedures and methodologies do you recommend?

Austenitic stainless steels (200-and 300-series steel) are the most common type of stainless steels. Austenite refers specifically to the geometry of the steel (face-centered cubic crystal). These types of steel are most typically recognized as non-magnetic. Austenitic steels are widely used in the industry because they have very desirable mechanical properties. Their austenitic structure is very tough and ductile down to absolute zero. They also do not lose their strength at elevated temperatures as rapidly as ferritic iron base alloys.
Read more

(2016) Question 21: What programs or systems do you employ to monitor hydrotreater furnaces and prevent tube failures and loss of containment? Can you share your experiences using technologies to implement online temperature monitoring of tube skin temperatures?

In nearly all hydroprocessing heaters, MPC has installed tubeskin thermocouples in order to provide continuous monitoring of tube metal temperatures to the DCS (distributed control system) operator. These thermocouples are strategically located in the heater at the areas with the highest estimated maximum heat flux.
Read more

(2016) Question 22: Describe your strategies for optimizing the pretreat and cracking catalyst cycles. How does this strategy vary when operating between maximum naphtha and maximum distillate modes? How does this impact catalyst selection for the next cycle?

Marathon Petroleum Company has adopted the philosophy of optimizing the hydrotreater and hydrocracking catalyst together as one unit. We do not measure nitrogen slip from the hydrotreater section, but rather allow the hydrocracker apparent conversion dictate adjustments to the pretreat section.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 55
  • Page 56
  • Page 57
  • Page 58
  • Current page 59
  • Page 60
  • Page 61
  • Page 62
  • Page 63
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top