We see typically dragger tube testing and head space H2S monitors being used. Mitigation is still done, for the most part, with chemical additives. The most commonly used additives are from the triazine family. As a result of the concerns that refiners have with some of the existing triazine and non-triazine (e.g., glyoxal) being used with respect to the impact on downstream equipment, Nalco Champion has developed both non-triazine, non-acidic (non-glyoxal), and low nitrogen alternative H2S scavengers.

There are many parameters affecting the hydrogen plant catalyst life cycles, such as lower production rates, furnace tube failure, unplanned plant shutdowns, larger catalyst volumes, elevated energy consumption, and finite ZnO/S (zinc oxide/sulfur) capacity. Lower Production Rates will obviously result in longer catalyst lifetime due to a lower gas velocity over the catalyst.

First, a response to the question: What are typical cascading practices that you employ for catalyst reuse after regeneration and eventual disposal? As the leading catalyst regenerator, Eurecat sees NiMo and CoMo hydrotreated catalysts (regenerated and regenerated plus rejuvenation) in ULSD, jet, kerosene, naphtha, and gas oil hydrotreating units.

Slurry hydrocracking technology has been commercialized in China (VCC) and Italy (EST) in the past two to three years. Both facilities have demonstrated expected performance, including conversion and selectivity. The reliability of slurry hydrocracking is still an open question as these units have only been in operation for a short time. Additional VCC commercial units are scheduled for startup in the next 12 months.

With the worldwide requirement for higher conversion of residue into lighter, more valuable transportation fuels such as diesel remaining firmly in place, we very much see ebullated-bed (EB) residue hydrocracking building on its current trend as a bottom-of-the-barrel upgrading technology of choice going forward. Investment in this commercially proven, well-established technology is a way to increase complexity and ensure long-term survival in an increasingly volatile marketplace.

CO and CO2are poisons for noble metal catalysts, with CO being a very strong poison. Contamination level as low as 50 to 100 ppm can result in significant and permanent loss of activity. CO should be limited to less than 10 ppm. In our experience, units which achieve long cycles (10 years plus) typically have CO levels less than 5 ppm.

Water wash systems must be designed well, with good water contact and draining, or the wash can create significant corrosion concerns, potentially resulting in process safety incidents. MPC experienced this first-hand with an intermittent wash system on an NHT unit.

Daily monitoring of feed nitrogen and distillation, via the Sim Dist (simulated distillation) method, will allow the refiner to adjust reactor temperature or control the final boiling point to meet the desired product nitrogen.

This question is more related to EOR conditions when you have employed all of the operational techniques but wish to further optimize the EOR performance without yield decline. If you are already maximizing H2 pp (partial pressure), achieving full catalyst utilization with state-of-the art reactor internals, and adjusting bed profiles at MOR/EOR (middle-of-run/end-of-run) to remain in region of optimum aromatic saturation, the following example illustrates the benefits of optimizing the nickel-molybdenum catalyst for your application.

The answer is partially the same as the one given to Question 28. First, the root cause needs to be determined. If the dP is caused by corrosion products due to corrosion in the upstream refinery units, the corrosion in these units can be reduced by applying the proper corrosion control program.