Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Operational Excellence Programs
My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Operational Excellence Programs
    • Safety Portal, Now MyAFPM
    • Alkylation Safety
    • FCC Process Safety Regional Workshops
    • Human & Organizational Performance
    • Walk the Line
    • Walk the Job
    • Q&A Database
    • Safety Statistics and Reports
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • Crude/Coking
    • Operations
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Corrosion
    • Crude Quality
    • Desalting
    • Safety
    • Vacuum Tower
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Safety
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
  • (-) 2018
  • (-) 2014
Search Filters

Process

  • Crude/Coking
    • Operations
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Corrosion
    • Crude Quality
    • Desalting
    • Safety
    • Vacuum Tower
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Safety
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
  • (-) 2018
  • (-) 2014
Filters

(2014) Question 90: What is the most profitable way to schedule the FCC and associated catalytic naphtha hydrotreater turnarounds? Are there benefits in synchronizing the shutdown of these units?

What is the most profitable way to schedule the FCC and associated catalytic naphtha hydrotreater turnarounds? Are there benefits in synchronizing the shutdown of these units?
Read more

(2014) Question 91: What are the characteristics of FCC catalyst to minimize particulate emissions at the stack?

While there are several operational and mechanical factors that can influence a unit’s particulate emissions, the question asks specifically about the FCC catalyst; as such, the following discussion will address characteristics of fresh catalyst only.
Read more

(2014) Question 92 What is the impact of high iron you have seen in some tight oil feeds? What level of Fe on the equilibrium catalyst causes problems, and what are the typical symptoms? What changes to FCC units hardware, catalyst and operation have you implemented to manage Fe poisoning? What is the impact of other uncommon contaminants such as K, Ca and Mg?

Tight oil feeds generally have high levels of iron and calcium present in them. Iron can have a negative effect on catalyst performance. While particulate tramp iron from rusting refinery equipment does not have a significant detrimental effect on catalyst, finely dispersed iron particles in feed (either as organic compounds or as colloidal inorganic particles) can deposit on the catalyst surface, reducing its effectiveness.
Read more

(2014) Question 93: What is your process safety concerns in withdrawing equilibrium catalyst from the FCC regenerator? How do you manage catalyst transfer piping and spent catalyst hopper temperatures? What materials of construction are appropriate (or inappropriate) for these services?

What is your process safety concerns in withdrawing equilibrium catalyst from the FCC regenerator? How do you manage catalyst transfer piping and spent catalyst hopper temperatures? What materials of construction are appropriate (or inappropriate) for these services?
Read more

(2014) Question 94: To reduce the risk of igniting the gas mixture in the electrostatic precipitator (ESP), we are considering safety interlocks for de-energizing the ESP when carbon monoxide content gets too high. Please share your experience regarding (a) setting an appropriate trip point, (b) other interlocks to consider, and (c) advantages over operating procedures.

Automatic trip points should be set so that the CO gas concentration is well below the Lower Explosive Limit (LEL). Consideration should also be given to adding interlocks to trip the ESP based on high concentrations of methane, especially if the ESP is downstream of a CO Boiler or if there are other potential sources of fuel gas/natural gas to the ESP (even during upset conditions).
Read more

(2014) Question 99: We are struggling with high afterburn in the regenerator. What hardware changes (spent catalyst distributor, air distributor, etc.) have you implemented to improve afterburn? What commercial experience exists using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to resolve such issues?

CFD has been successfully used to predict afterburn in FCC regenerators. A published example was presented as part of the CFD Case Studies workshop at the 2012 AFPM Cat Cracker Seminar.
Read more

(2014) Question 100: How do Nitrogen compounds distribute in the product streams of FCC Units? What effect does riser severity and feed properties have on this distribution?

How do Nitrogen compounds distribute in the product streams of FCC Units? What effect does riser severity and feed properties have on this distribution?
Read more

(2014) Question 101: What factors influence butylene selectivity in the FCC LPG? What is the relative role of feedstocks, catalysts, additives, and operating conditions?

A number of factors influence butylene selectivity in the FCC LPG stream. Figure 1 summarizes the fundamentals of butylene selectivity and maximization.
Read more

(2014) Question 102: What benefits have you realized by installing packing in their FCC strippers? How did this equipment impact your catalyst circulation and unit pressure balance?

What benefits have you realized by installing packing in their FCC strippers? How did this equipment impact your catalyst circulation and unit pressure balance?
Read more

(2014) Question 103: We increased reactor severity and noticed an increase in oxygenates in LPG and sour water. Can you explain the mechanism by which phenols and other oxygenates form in the riser?

Since increasing reactor severity will result in an increase in catalyst circulation, it is likely that the increased oxygenate production being observed is from the higher catalyst circulation which is increasing the entrained molecular oxygen carryover to the riser.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Current page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2026 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top