Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Operational Excellence Programs
My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Operational Excellence Programs
    • Safety Portal, Now MyAFPM
    • Alkylation Safety
    • FCC Process Safety Regional Workshops
    • Human & Organizational Performance
    • Walk the Line
    • Walk the Job
    • Q&A Database
    • Safety Statistics and Reports
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Isomerization
    • Reforming
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
  • (-) 2016
  • (-) 2013
Search Filters

Process

  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Isomerization
    • Reforming
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
  • (-) 2016
  • (-) 2013
Filters

(2013) Question 27: What options are refiners considering addressing upcoming Tier 3 Fuel Standards [10 wppm (weight parts per billion) annual average sulfur in gasoline]?

Tier 3 fuel is lowering sulfur yet again in gasoline. The crude oil sulfurs have been coming down also with the tight oil, so some people have asked the question: Is processing more tight oil actually going to get us on-spec on Tier 3? The answer is no, not really. It is not going to have that significant of an impact on your gasoline sulfurs, obviously, without other processing.
Read more

(2013) Question 28: Is the changing quantity of pentanes and pentenes in refinery streams and tightening gasoline regulations leading to operators considering different processing strategies in order to maintain gasoline blend pool specifications? Comment on increased pentene alkylation, decreased pentane isomerization, or other disposition sources.

The pentenes, also called amylenes, can be fed to the alkylation unit and be alkylated. However, you make a lot of ASO (acid-soluble oil) and the yield is not that great; so, most people prefer not to do it. We do not alkylate our amylenes at the moment.
Read more

(2013) Question 29: What are the industry practices to take samples around high-pressure equipment which contain light hydrocarbon and H2S? How do you ensure the samples are handled safely and representative of sample stream?

Our Corpus Christi and Pine Bend refineries had standardized on Texas Sampling Incorporated samplers. They provide a variety of closed loop captured sample systems. We have a Sampler Selection Procedure Flowchart that helps us walk through ‘yes’ or ‘no’ decisions considering high RVP (Reid vapor pressure) material, high-pressure material, high temperature material, high H2S (hydrogen sulfide) options, and plugging potential.
Read more

(2013) Question 30: What are your design practices for reactor skin thermocouple requirements in a hydrotreater and a hydrocracker for startups and safe operation?

Our minimal requirement for a hydrotreater is three skin thermocouples at the top and bottom heads of the reactors and a full skin thermocouple at the bottom shell of the reactor just about at the tangent line. The option now is a full skin thermocouple at the top of the shell and the middle of the shell.
Read more

(2013) Question 74: How effective are the following decoke methods in a delayed coker furnace: online spalling, mechanical pigging, and steam air decoking?

The way the panel decided to answer this question was for me to give an overview of the different methods and a few of the pros and cons. Then one of the other panelists will present his actual experience. The mechanical method employs metal studded pigs which are pushed in water.
Read more

(2013) Question 75: What are the potential problems or negative impacts of utilizing FCC slurry/decant oil as coke drum OH (overhead) line quench oil?

Again, FCC slurry/decant oil has a similar distillation range to HCGO but a higher endpoint. Although it could possibly be used as just overhead quench, we caution that if the slurry/decant oil is not be filtered properly, it will contain catalyst fines that could accelerate the coke deposition by settling in equipment or piping.
Read more

(2013) Question 76: What has been the industry experience in mitigating the impact of solids in the feed or coke fines in the fractionator side draws and recycled cutting water?

We use settling mazes in the water section to minimize fines without chemical injection, and then we vacuum out individual cells on a periodic frequency to recover the fines.
Read more

(2013) Question 77: What are the consequences associated with continuing to operate the FCC without main fractionator bottoms cooling circulation?

We considered this question as three parts: What is the action to follow in the event of a loss of bottoms’ cooling? What is the consequence if you lose the net slurry product? What are the operational possibilities if you have a well-planned outage of the slurry circuit? In situations one and two where you have lost circulation or you have lost the net bottoms’ product in the system here, we expect that you would shut down the unit consistent with your licensure’s emergency shutdown procedures.
Read more

(2013) Question 78: What procedures (maintenance and operational) are being used to minimize risk when swinging the blind between the reactor/main fractionator?

There are two scenarios to consider: shutdown and startup. I will address the shutdown scenario first. For the shutdown scenario, catalyst is de-inventoried from the reactor and regenerator systems, and the main column and reactor are cooled down to 350°F. There are certain operational conditions that must be satisfied before the blind is installed.
Read more

(2013) Question 79: How do you mitigate the risk of falling coke deposits from the reactor plenum chamber and vapor line during initial vessel entry?

We have not had the experience of falling coke deposits on vessel entry. We usually experience difficulty in removing the coke deposits, and we do this by mechanical means. Prior to entry into the reactor, a visual inspection is made from the manway. It is typical to see stalactites from the reactor plenum.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Current page 30
  • Page 31
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2026 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top