Filters

(2011) Question 32: What are your best practices for minimizing corrosion in aromatics extraction process from oxygen in the feed? Is the strategy to reduce oxygen ingress or treat the feed? Is the situation different for glycol, Sulfolane, Morpholine, or other solvents?

Udex unit uses Tetra Ethylene Glycol as solvent. The Udex performance w.r.t. corrosion was not so high initially after revamp, but we started experiencing severe corrosion from 2008 onwards in stripper reboiler, severe thinning of stripper bottom tray panels and unit had to be shut down repeatedly in 4-5 months interval for attending reboiler leaky tubes till M&I shut down was taken up.
Read more

(2011) Question 45: What tools are you using to predict the yields of Xylene, Benzene, Toluene and other aromatics in a catalytic reformer? What methods do you use and how often do you test the feedstock for these variables? Other than feedstock quality, what factors are you accounting for in the individual yields (unit pressure, RON, etc)? Do you have any rules of thumb for conversion of certain species of aromatics?

Dedicated simulators are run for prediction, either using correlations or kinetic models. To be able to perform accurate predictions, feed analyses shall be performed every time the feedstock quality is changed: the most important one is detailed hydrocarbon analysis by gas chromatography (for instance Carburane).
Read more

(2016) Question 18: The increased production of light straight-run (LSR) from crude units is likely to have an impact on refiners’plans for Tier 3 compliance. What strategies do you employ in order to manage this issue?

Tier 3 drives hydrotreating of essentially all light naphtha streams. Since most United States refineries have FCCs, it is usually desirable to hydrotreat other gasoline streams more completely to minimize the FCC naphtha olefin saturation and the associated octane loss
Read more

(2016) Question 25: For refinery complexes considering grassroots or brownfield expansion of gas oil conversion capacity, what are your typical capital expenditure (capex) costs and relative refinery margin improvement between FCC (fluid catalytic cracking) and hydrocracking? What are the key technology features that impact your economic decision? What are the crucial considerations that, if they include both technologies, to allow for future integration, especially around the changing gasoline/diese

In general, Marathon’s economic viewpoint is that hydrocrackers have better projected margins going forward than FCCUs, as they maximize higher valued ULSD over gasoline and have higher volume expansion (see Figure 1). This is driven by many factors mentioned in the primary response and is particularly attractive when ULSD is strong relative to gasoline and when natural gas or hydrogen) is inexpensive. Each company has a different viewpoint on this topic, so the opinion will vary somewhat across the industry.
Read more

(2016) Question 38: What do you see for the future of ebullated bed technology considering changes in crude quality and availability?

With the worldwide requirement for higher conversion of residue into lighter, more valuable transportation fuels such as diesel remaining firmly in place, we very much see ebullated-bed (EB) residue hydrocracking building on its current trend as a bottom-of-the-barrel upgrading technology of choice going forward. Investment in this commercially proven, well-established technology is a way to increase complexity and ensure long-term survival in an increasingly volatile marketplace.
Read more