Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Environmental
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Reforming
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Feed Quality
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Mechanical

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Vendor
  • (-) Consultant

Year QA

  • 2010
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Environmental
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Reforming
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Feed Quality
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Mechanical

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Vendor
  • (-) Consultant

Year QA

  • 2010
Filters

(2010) Question 89: In shifting from partial burn to full burn in a side by side unit, what has been your observed impact on the NOx emissions? What is necessary to achieve 20 ppm NOx?

Several Grace customers successfully operate with NOx emissions less than 20 ppm in full combustion without the use of NOx removal hardware in the flue gas circuit.
Read more

(2010) Question 91: Assuming the FCCU already has a third stage separator, what are the various options you consider for further reduction of particulate emissions (PM) and what is the expected level of PM to be achieved?

The first thing to consider is the fourth stage collector. For designs that re-introduce the collected fines downstream of the expander, a fourth stage collector with fines removal and filter on the TSS underflow gas will aid in reducing PM.
Read more

Question 2: Which type of valve technology or design is typically utilized in units with high catalyst withdrawal rates? Do you continuously withdraw catalyst? From a reliability and safety perspective, what type of hardware are you using for control? What is the best withdrawal line design?

Valve selection for FCC catalyst withdrawal services is dictated by temperature and erosion considerations.
Read more

Question 3: Carbonate stress corrosion cracking (CSCC) has been identified as a cause of failure in FCC main fractionator overhead systems. What changes in feed quality, unit operation, or configuration would lead to increased risk of CSCC? What parameters do you monitor to determine whether a system is susceptible to CSCC? Has the problem been significant enough to warrant either comprehensive PWHT in potentially affected areas or localized PWHT when problem areas are identified?

Carbonate stress corrosion cracking, CSCC, is characterized by inter-granular, sometimes branchy, scale-filled cracks. It is believed that ammonium carbonate is the main contributor to the cracking mechanism.
Read more

Question 5: What is the shortest possible time between oil out and entry for maintenance on large inventory, high capacity FCC units? How is this achieved?

With FCCs at 27,000 bpd and 9,000 bpd capacity, neither of our units really qualifies for high throughput or large capacity. However, in discussions amongst the members of the panel, we found that throughput and inventory are not necessarily good indicators of how quickly you can move oil-out to maintenance-in.
Read more

Question 6: Some CO and waste heat boilers operate with bypass stacks separated by seal pots or isolation valves. Maintenance of these seal systems can be expensive and these seal systems can be sources of poor reliability. What design upgrades and operating practices have enabled you to eliminate these bypass systems?

Holly Refining continues to use bypass stacks with diversion valves at both of our refineries. Those stacks and diversion valves are allowed by permit and we use them during startup/shutdown manning upset conditions. Both our Operations and Maintenance groups are assigned weekly preventative maintenance tasks to ensure operability when we do have to throw these valves.
Read more

Question 10: What is your recent experience regarding the maximum level of equilibrium catalyst metals (Ni, V, Na, Fe, Ca) in FCC units processing residual feedstocks? Have there been any recent improvements in vanadium passivation technologies? At nickel levels approaching 10,000 ppm, have you experienced increased catalyst deactivation as evidenced by lower equilibrium zeolite surface area?

Here we see data regarding one of our FCCUs that operates at e-cat nickel levels exceeding 10,000 ppm. We observe that the MAT generally remains within the same range until high e-cat nickel concentrations are approached.
Read more

Question 11: What process or catalyst options are available for shifting yield selectivities from gasoline to distillate while minimizing the impact on light olefin yields? How are the product properties impacted? How does change-out rate impact the viability of the catalyst options?

Undercutting gasoline into light cycle is the first option and is widely employed. It is quick, it is easy, and it gives an immediate impact. Reducing riser temperature and/or cat-to-oil ratios reduces conversion, while using a ZSM-5 additive to regain C3-C4 olefins is another option.
Read more

Question 13: With the move toward greater utilization of “opportunity crudes” such as Canadian synthetic crudes, what shifts do you expect in FCC product yield and quality, and how will this impact the operation of the FCC unit?

Holly’s choice for opportunity crudes are somewhat limited by our position as an inland refiner and being located far away from many of the crude pipelines. We are making changes in both the way we operate our units, as well as our capital investment, so that we can maintain our current slate with crudes of varying quality.
Read more

Question 21: When operating with one or more catalyst coolers on a regenerator, what control philosophy do you employ (e.g., constant heat duty, constant regenerator temperature, etc.)? What are the advantages and disadvantages for each approach? How does operating in full- or partial-burn impact the control decision?

A catalyst cooler is basically a vertical shell-andtube heat exchanger attached to the regenerator. The cooler extracts high quality heat from the catalyst in the regenerator to produce high pressure steam.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Page 1
  • Current page 2

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top