Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • (-) Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • (-) Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2016) Question 69: Our FCC unit is limited by coke burn and high regenerator temperatures. What catalyst and operational changes have you implemented to maximize the conversion of heavy feeds and increase the amount of resid we can process without running into our regenerator limits and increasing dry gas production?

Considering the stated goals and constraints, particularly being limited by regenerator temperature and coke-burning capacity, it will be necessary to reduce delta coke without significantly increasing the reactor heat demand.
Read more

(2016) Question 20: When is it appropriate to neutralize austenitic stainless-steel equipment to protect against stress corrosion cracking (SCC)? What neutralization procedures and methodologies do you recommend?

Austenitic stainless steels (200-and 300-series steel) are the most common type of stainless steels. Austenite refers specifically to the geometry of the steel (face-centered cubic crystal). These types of steel are most typically recognized as non-magnetic. Austenitic steels are widely used in the industry because they have very desirable mechanical properties. Their austenitic structure is very tough and ductile down to absolute zero. They also do not lose their strength at elevated temperatures as rapidly as ferritic iron base alloys.
Read more

(2016) Question 21: What programs or systems do you employ to monitor hydrotreater furnaces and prevent tube failures and loss of containment? Can you share your experiences using technologies to implement online temperature monitoring of tube skin temperatures?

In nearly all hydroprocessing heaters, MPC has installed tubeskin thermocouples in order to provide continuous monitoring of tube metal temperatures to the DCS (distributed control system) operator. These thermocouples are strategically located in the heater at the areas with the highest estimated maximum heat flux.
Read more

(2016) Question 22: Describe your strategies for optimizing the pretreat and cracking catalyst cycles. How does this strategy vary when operating between maximum naphtha and maximum distillate modes? How does this impact catalyst selection for the next cycle?

Marathon Petroleum Company has adopted the philosophy of optimizing the hydrotreater and hydrocracking catalyst together as one unit. We do not measure nitrogen slip from the hydrotreater section, but rather allow the hydrocracker apparent conversion dictate adjustments to the pretreat section.
Read more

(2016) Question 23: How do you operate mid-distillate selective recycle hydrocracking units to generate more naphtha while minimizing fuel gas/liquefied petroleum gas without catalyst replacement?

Maintaining flexibility to make gasoline versus ULSD (ultra-low sulfur diesel) is very important to most refiners today due to the volatile nature of the market. Understanding the economic goals of your process unit and building in the flexibility through your catalyst selection process is the best way to set up your process for flexibility in the coming run.
Read more

(2016) Question 70: What is your method for measuring naphthenic acid [TAN (total acid number)] in FCC feed? Is this method affected by VABP (volume average boiling point) or Concarbon (Conradson carbon) content? Do you have data that validates an appropriate integrity operating window (IOW) trigger level? If above the trigger level, what is your recommended corrective action (extra inspection, change crude/slate, etc.)?

In terms of TAN number, we typically recommend the standard test method UOP 565, which can be found through the ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) website.
Read more

(2016) Question 71: In your experience, what factors affect NOx emissions for a partial-burn FCC with a CO boiler? How do you achieve 50 ppm CO emissions while simultaneously minimizing NOx emissions through the stack?

Combustor-or incinerator-style CO boilers can produce lower NOx emissions than direct burning CO boilers (COBs). COBs with cold planes where the CO is combusted (package boilers, as an example) require high firing rates to combust the CO to acceptable levels, thereby increasing the liberation and NOx contribution.
Read more

(2016) Question 72: Recent drone technology advancements have enabled refiners and contractors to improve the efficiency of maintenance and inspection activities. With this, how are your hot work permits and general safety policies evolving to sustain adequate asset and personnel protection at all times? For instance, what additional safety permits or considerations would apply for drone use and aerial inspections?

In June 2016, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)announced that it had finalized the first operational rules for routine commercial use of small, unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) including “drones”. According to industry estimates, the rule could generate more than $82 billion for the U.S. economy and create more than 100,000 new jobs over the next 10 years.
Read more

(2016) Question 73: What criteria do you use to justify sea-less pumps in place of conventional double-seal pumps in LPG services? What are the operational and reliability issues associated with these types of seal-less pumps?

Seal-less pumps can be either mag drive or canned motor. Seal-less pumps are now commonly used all over the refinery and petrochemical industries. The U.S.is quite a bit behind Europe in the use of seal-less pumps. Europe has been specifying seal-less for multiple services since the mid-1980s.
Read more

(2016) Question 74: In your experience, what are the effects of different Ni passivation technologies on the performance of CO promoters and stack emissions?

Nickel passivation can be accomplished a few ways: antimony, bismuth, or sulfur. Adding antimony or bismuth in a solution, such as LCO, will immediately begin to passivate the negative effects of nickel poisoning. Antimony is considered a fugitive emission and may be hazardous; bismuth may be the safer option.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Current page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top