Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Operational Excellence Programs
My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Operational Excellence Programs
    • Safety Portal, Now MyAFPM
    • Alkylation Safety
    • FCC Process Safety Regional Workshops
    • Human & Organizational Performance
    • Walk the Line
    • Walk the Job
    • Q&A Database
    • Safety Statistics and Reports
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • (-) Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • (-) Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2016) Question 42: What are your typical H2S (hydrogen sulfide) detection and monitoring methods used on heavy oil fractions being transported via truck, rail, or barge? What are the mitigation options you employ?

We see typically dragger tube testing and head space H2S monitors being used. Mitigation is still done, for the most part, with chemical additives. The most commonly used additives are from the triazine family. As a result of the concerns that refiners have with some of the existing triazine and non-triazine (e.g., glyoxal) being used with respect to the impact on downstream equipment, Nalco Champion has developed both non-triazine, non-acidic (non-glyoxal), and low nitrogen alternative H2S scavengers.
Read more

(2016) Question 43: Have you experienced high corrosion rates in carbon steel piping in resid service operating below 500°F? Please comment on corrosion mechanisms.

High corrosion rates have been experienced in heavier streams, like RCO (reduced crude oil) and vacuum residue operating at a temperature of 450 to 600°F. The role of naphthenic acid corrosion is difficult to determine in such streams with respect to the TAN (total acid number) distribution, temperature and velocity. The key precursor is sulfur species which causes “sulfidic corrosion” in such residue streams.
Read more

(2016) Question 67: As distillate demand has decreased, current economics favor maximizing gasoline and octane. What operating and catalyst changes do you recommend for increasing octane barrels?

An FCC unit contributes to the gasoline pool through both cracked gasoline production and C4s production, which is used to generate high octane alkylate for blending.
Read more

(2016) Question 68: What is your experience with processing raw crude in the FCC? What types of crude have you tried to process in the FCC? What are the yield impacts? Any corrosion issues associated with this mode of operation? What additional corrosion monitoring is needed?

I have not had any experience running raw crude directly into an FCC unit; however, I know there are refiners out there that do. Many refiners who are running a high percentage of tight oils into their crude units have found that there is typically a shortage of FCC feed, which has led to some of them charging tight oils straight into the FCC.
Read more

(2016) Question 69: Our FCC unit is limited by coke burn and high regenerator temperatures. What catalyst and operational changes have you implemented to maximize the conversion of heavy feeds and increase the amount of resid we can process without running into our regenerator limits and increasing dry gas production?

Considering the stated goals and constraints, particularly being limited by regenerator temperature and coke-burning capacity, it will be necessary to reduce delta coke without significantly increasing the reactor heat demand.
Read more

(2016) Question 70: What is your method for measuring naphthenic acid [TAN (total acid number)] in FCC feed? Is this method affected by VABP (volume average boiling point) or Concarbon (Conradson carbon) content? Do you have data that validates an appropriate integrity operating window (IOW) trigger level? If above the trigger level, what is your recommended corrective action (extra inspection, change crude/slate, etc.)?

In terms of TAN number, we typically recommend the standard test method UOP 565, which can be found through the ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) website.
Read more

(2016) Question 71: In your experience, what factors affect NOx emissions for a partial-burn FCC with a CO boiler? How do you achieve 50 ppm CO emissions while simultaneously minimizing NOx emissions through the stack?

Combustor-or incinerator-style CO boilers can produce lower NOx emissions than direct burning CO boilers (COBs). COBs with cold planes where the CO is combusted (package boilers, as an example) require high firing rates to combust the CO to acceptable levels, thereby increasing the liberation and NOx contribution.
Read more

(2016) Question 72: Recent drone technology advancements have enabled refiners and contractors to improve the efficiency of maintenance and inspection activities. With this, how are your hot work permits and general safety policies evolving to sustain adequate asset and personnel protection at all times? For instance, what additional safety permits or considerations would apply for drone use and aerial inspections?

In June 2016, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)announced that it had finalized the first operational rules for routine commercial use of small, unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) including “drones”. According to industry estimates, the rule could generate more than $82 billion for the U.S. economy and create more than 100,000 new jobs over the next 10 years.
Read more

(2016) Question 73: What criteria do you use to justify sea-less pumps in place of conventional double-seal pumps in LPG services? What are the operational and reliability issues associated with these types of seal-less pumps?

Seal-less pumps can be either mag drive or canned motor. Seal-less pumps are now commonly used all over the refinery and petrochemical industries. The U.S.is quite a bit behind Europe in the use of seal-less pumps. Europe has been specifying seal-less for multiple services since the mid-1980s.
Read more

(2016) Question 74: In your experience, what are the effects of different Ni passivation technologies on the performance of CO promoters and stack emissions?

Nickel passivation can be accomplished a few ways: antimony, bismuth, or sulfur. Adding antimony or bismuth in a solution, such as LCO, will immediately begin to passivate the negative effects of nickel poisoning. Antimony is considered a fugitive emission and may be hazardous; bismuth may be the safer option.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Current page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2026 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top