Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD
  • Gasoline Processing
    • (-) Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD
  • Gasoline Processing
    • (-) Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2013) Question 30: What are your design practices for reactor skin thermocouple requirements in a hydrotreater and a hydrocracker for startups and safe operation?

Our minimal requirement for a hydrotreater is three skin thermocouples at the top and bottom heads of the reactors and a full skin thermocouple at the bottom shell of the reactor just about at the tangent line. The option now is a full skin thermocouple at the top of the shell and the middle of the shell.
Read more

(2013) Question 31: What is the threshold concentration of arsenic and phosphorus requiring a dedicated trap system? How are the arsenic and phosphorus trap systems specified,and what are the controlling mechanisms?

Arsenic is a big concern because it is a permanent poison that causes fairly significant activity. We generally see around a 60° Floss per weight percent pickup; so, you will want to pay attention to it. As a side note, it is also common in most fractions of hydrotreating: so anything from naphtha to heavy gas oil.
Read more

(2013) Question 32: What is a typical range of HDM (hydrodemetallization; metals removal) in a gas oil hydrotreater? Can HDM decline rapidly when metals in the feed become excessive relative to catalyst system design? Is there a point when metals in the feed are so high that they “overwhelm” the demet (demetallization) and main bed catalyst, resulting in lower percent of HDM?

Nickel and vanadium contamination generally come in heavy gas oils and resid hydrotreating. It is obviously not very common in diesels and light feeds. We see that it is about a 5°F to 9°F loss per weight percent combined pickup. The reason you will want to pay attention to these metals is because of their ability to actually diffuse onto the catalyst, so you will need a space to deposit them.
Read more

(2013) Question 33: What is the philosophy or criteria for optimizing catalyst bed grading material to prevent high reactor pressure drop from feed containing significant amounts of Fe (iron)?

Certainly, identifying the sources of the iron coming in – whether organic, iron oxides, iron sulfides, or just scale from tanks – is very critical to understanding your best strategy for mitigating pressure drop. Ultimately, when you form iron sulfide, it creates deposits on the bed and coke deposition, and certainly leads to reduced catalyst life.
Read more

(2013) Question 34: When processing cracked naphtha, what is done to ensure that polymerization of the diolefins/olefins will not result in pressure drop problems in a reactor or upstream equipment?

Again, we are trying to prevent the polymerization of the olefin/diolefin. The primary concern is trying to prevent contact with oxygen because that will ultimately lead to gum formation. So, the preference would be, if possible, to feed this hot to all the downstream units and avoid intermediate storage.
Read more

(2013) Question 35: When processing tight oil crudes, are lower bed pressure drop problems in VGO/resid hydrotreater reactors a concern? If so, what mechanisms explain this issue?

The highly paraffinic nature of the tight crudes and the destabilization of asphaltene molecules can cause precipitation and agglomeration. One of our customers with a gas oil mild hydrocracker switched feedstock to increase amounts of black wax crude. This was a five-reactor system.
Read more

(2013) Question 36: Has the increased use of tight oil crudes and western Canadian crude been correlated with increased metals and solids in diesel, gas oil or vacuum resid?

The FHR CC (Corpus Christi) refinery has not seen an increase in raw crude filterable solids. With the increased domestic crude rates, we typically run about 20 to 50 pounds per thousand barrels with these occasional spikes to 100. We have recently started monitoring the filtrate from the 0.45-micron test with 0.1-micron paper.
Read more

(2013) Question 37: How does the increased processing of tight oil (Eagle Ford, Bakken, etc.) affect hydroprocessing operations? With lighter feeds and less sulfur, how can the hydroprocessing reactors and catalyst systems be tailored to optimize performance? What other factors in economics replace volume gain when processing these lighter feeds (i.e., impact on FCC yields, gasoline blending, minimizing cetane giveaway, etc.)?

Tight oil crudes have impacted our hydrotreater operations in several ways. Catalyst lifecycles are extending due to the low severity required for treating low-sulfur feed. Low reactor severities have caused emulsion problems due to our not hydrogenating our surface-active compounds in the feed.
Read more

(2013) Question 38: Elaborate on the relative value of the various distillate feed streams in a refinery (i.e., straight-run diesel, light atmospheric gas oil, light vacuum gas oil, light cycle oil, coker distillate, kerosene, coker naphtha, heavy cat naphtha, and other) when considering maximum saturation and volume swell in high-pressure ULSD service.

The question asks specifically about high-pressure ULSD service. ‘High pressure’ means the reactor has to operate around 1,000 pounds without any problem supplying hydrogen to these units. The relative value of the volume swell depends on how much you can saturate aromatics. This aromatic saturation is an equilibrium reaction, so you need high hydrogen partial pressure on the lower temperature side.
Read more

(2013) Question 39: There is a drive to target the highest endpoint possible on all distillate feed streams when maximizing overall diesel production. Are there feed streams that should be targeted first, considering operational impacts of such optimization, impacts to catalyst performance and life cycle, as well as cutpoint optimization between distillate units and the FCC?

For maximum diesel, in general, we prefer getting the distillate out of the FCC. I think we had a discussion last year in the FCC forum during which we said that keeping some distillate in the FCC feed is a benefit. We still say that if you want to maximize the diesel, heavy-out the straight-run distillate of virgin gas oil because it will be the easiest to treat compared to the other two, which are coker distillate and LCO.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 38
  • Page 39
  • Page 40
  • Page 41
  • Page 42
  • Page 43
  • Current page 44
  • Page 45
  • Page 46
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top