Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Gasoline Processing
    • (-) Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Licensor
  • Operator
  • Vendor
  • Consultant

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Gasoline Processing
    • (-) Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Licensor
  • Operator
  • Vendor
  • Consultant

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
Filters

(2015) Question 63: What type of facilities have you used to cool hot vacuum residue going to storage to avoid plugging problems and facilitate reprocessing?

I am going to focus on the system we have and also some of the issues we have experienced. The majority of our resid that is produced off the crude unit vacuum towers is sent through the hot resid system straight to the cokers. We have two crude unit trains.
Read more

(2015) Question 64: What are acceptable makeup water streams that can be used for coke cutting which will not affect the coke quality?

With regard to coke quality, a lot of the available streams are acceptable. A few of the additional considerations to take into account are: Is this makeup water stream going to add overall load to my wastewater treatment facility? Is this new water? Is this water that I can recycle? Streams that are acceptable are: stripped sour water. If you are not reusing this water at your desalters or FCC wet gas scrubbers, then it would be an acceptable stream. 
Read more

(2015) Question 65: Discuss operating conditions and economic drivers to produce maximum diesel from the coker.

When your margins indicate the need to pull more diesel, you have two options: You can check the top of your tower, or you can adjust overhead temperatures and fractionations to confirm that you are pushing the maximum amount of heavy naphtha down into the diesel.
Read more

(2015) Question 66: Concerning new regulations for lower coke drum pressure prior to opening, what changes will you make?

Amec Foster Wheeler has several designs that could be incorporated in existing units to meet the expected EPA mandate of depressurizing the drums to 2 psig or less prior to opening the vent. Options include adding an ejector or vent gas compressor to lower the drum pressure.
Read more

(2014) Question 56: How will the recently announced EPA requirement to depressure coke drums to below 2 Psig prior to venting to atmosphere regulations impact your coker operation and design?

In order to meet the potential requirement of less than 2 psig prior to atmospheric venting, new units designed to operate at low coke drum pressure will require additional equipment such as an ejector system discharging to a condenser (potentially the blowdown or fractionator overhead condenser) to adequately reduce the coke drum pressure prior to atmospheric venting.
Read more

(2014) Question 57: If vacuum tower bottom feed to the Coker unit drops below unit minimum, what are your operating options available?

Increasing amount of tight oil production with hardly any residual fraction will lead to challenges in filling up the Delayed Coking Unit (DCU). In order to maintain the DCU capacity, external purchase of HFO or VR will have to be made.
Read more

(2014) Question 58: What are you using for velocity medium in coker heaters? Are you using boiler feed water?

If Condensate or BFW is used as velocity media or to clear the heater tubes during a heater trip, precautions must be taken as excess free water has the potential to overpressure the heater during a shut-in condition.
Read more

(2014) Question 59: What is your experience processing a crude oil that has been treated with a pour point depressant and/or wax dispersant agent?

Some laboratory simulation experience has demonstrated that there were no adverse impacts to processing crude oil treated with a certain pour point depressant relative to oil-water separation for desalting.
Read more

(2014) Question 60: How does the mercury in crude distribute in your refinery (e.g., what units are affected)? What operating procedures or technology are you using to mitigate this issue?

How does the mercury in crude distribute in your refinery (e.g., what units are affected)? What operating procedures or technology are you using to mitigate this issue?
Read more

(2014) Question 61: What measurement and/or predictive methods are you using to determine crude oil blend compatibility?

Various methods exist to determine blend compatibility; one method would be a comparative asphaltene instability point determination via an anti-solvent titration, or another method used is the Wiehe insolubility number to solubility blend number method.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Current page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Page 36
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top