Question 5: What is the shortest possible time between oil out and entry for maintenance on large inventory, high capacity FCC units? How is this achieved?
Question 4: Does your refinery/company adopt a time-based rather than inspection-based replacement strategy for FCC reactor and regenerator hardware such as feed nozzles, air distributor, cyclones, cyclone support systems, and flue gas expansion joint bellows? If so, what is the planned service life for this equipment?
Question 3: Carbonate stress corrosion cracking (CSCC) has been identified as a cause of failure in FCC main fractionator overhead systems. What changes in feed quality, unit operation, or configuration would lead to increased risk of CSCC? What parameters do you monitor to determine whether a system is susceptible to CSCC? Has the problem been significant enough to warrant either comprehensive PWHT in potentially affected areas or localized PWHT when problem areas are identified?
Question 2: Which type of valve technology or design is typically utilized in units with high catalyst withdrawal rates? Do you continuously withdraw catalyst? From a reliability and safety perspective, what type of hardware are you using for control? What is the best withdrawal line design?
Question 1: Historically, instrument air was used to purge FCC reactor instruments. More recently, dry gas or nitrogen is typically used for this service. Please explain the reasons for moving away from air and provide examples of operating upsets that have occurred when using air to purge instruments.
Question 32: Where are ammonium chloride and amine hydrochloride salt found in your crude unit? What is your best practice to monitor and mitigate the resulting corrosion and fouling?
Question 31: Is intermittent or continuous mud washing considered your best practice and why?
STEVE WILLIAMS (Marathon Petroleum Corporation)
• Mud wash is utilized to help keep the bottoms of a desalter vessel relative free of solids build up.
• Utilizes a distribution header with nozzles located near the bottom of the desalter to create a liquid disturbance at the bottom to preclude solids settling.
• Typical design is for water circulation through the system at 10 gpm/nozzle or approximately 10 ft/s velocity.
Question 30: What progress have you made in crude analysis in a timely manner, establishing stability criteria, scheduling blends, and mitigating processing constraints when blending multiple crude unit feedstocks?
XIOMARA PRICE (SUEZ Water Technologies & Solutions)
Crude blending is still largely based on the economics of the blends and less on the processing constraints that may exist. Real time analytic and predictive tools are available to the industry to help quickly determine the blends relative instability and fouling potential. The output from these tools can provide refiners with the information needed to proactively setup mitigation plans to address any foreseen instability or fouling problems.
Question 28: In light of IMO (International Maritime Organization) 2020 and the potential for shipping intermediate streams from refinery to refinery, what are your plans to ensure H2S specification in the vapor space is met, either at the shipping or receiving point?
STEVE WILLIAMS (Marathon Petroleum Corporation)
• Movement of intermediate streams from refinery to refinery has been a common practice, including movement of heavy oils. This activity is expected to increase following implementation of the IMO 2020 rules reducing the sulfur content in maritime fuels.
• In recent history, following the more widespread use of personal H2S monitors, the exposure potential that these streams and associated handling operations presented became more apparent.