Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • Gasoline Processing
  • Hydroprocessing
  • FCC
  • Crude/Coking

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
  • (-) 2014
  • (-) 2013
Search Filters

Process

  • Gasoline Processing
  • Hydroprocessing
  • FCC
  • Crude/Coking

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
  • (-) 2014
  • (-) 2013
Filters

(2013) Question 40: Economic drivers dictate the need to process more difficult feedstocks, such as cracked stocks and diesel feeds with high distillation endpoints. What are typical guidelines regarding minimum hydrogen partial pressure for a given feedstock? (High-level answer with details will be discussed in the Hydroprocessing P&P.)

We are treating feedstocks with higher endpoints and greater volumes of cracked feedstocks. Certainly, you are faced with refractory sulfur species that are harder organic nitrogen compounds, which then inhibits sulfur removal and polyaromatics. Higher hydrogen partial pressures are required to achieve diesel specifications and maximize catalyst life in a conventional treater.
Read more

(2013) Question 41: In an effort to increase margins on hydrotreating units, what strategies and/or new technologies are refiners employing to minimize utility usage? What are the economics and reliability of adding a power recovery turbine?

In the IsoTherming® liquid hydrotreating process, there is a substantial reduction in utilities on a unit we just started up with 40% straight-run/60% light cycle oil.
Read more

(2013) Question 42: Occasionally we make off-color jet (pink, blue, or green). What are the causes, and what can be done to correct this?

The question was specific to off-color jet, but we can have other off-color material. We have seen red, yellow, green, and brown. Most typically, the yellow and green tend to be associated with the lighter products, red and brown with the heavier ones. But again, you can get various colors throughout the spectrum.
Read more

(2013) Question 43: Can FCCU feed pre-treatment achieve the new Tier 3 gasoline sulfur targets without post-gasoline treatment? What criteria are used to select the optimal combination of pre-treatment and post-treatment severities to meet the Tier 3 objectives?

For Tier 3 gasoline, the anticipated average of 10 ppm sulfur will be required by 2017. In order to understand what will be needed to meet those specs, you will have to do a review of a number of factors that contribute to the sulfur, including understanding your crude diet and the material that is actually going into the gasoline pool, as well as blend components.
Read more

(2013) Question 44: What are refiner’s practices or procedures to remove catalyst from a reactor when the catalyst will not free flow dump? What is the industry's experience with hydro drilling for removal of non-free-flow catalyst from fixed-bed units?

We typically vacuum out catalyst in an inert atmosphere if the reactors do not free-flow dump. We also wet dump some of our reactors, which involves vacuuming out the catalyst after removing the water. For people who are involved in turnaround planning, unloading rates for free-flowing catalyst are approximately 200 cubic feet of catalyst per hour.
Read more

(2013) Question 45: What are the procedures/rules governing the transportation and disposal of catalyst contaminated with arsenic, mercury, barium, or other heavy metals? Are there maximum limits for any of these?

The spent catalyst needs to be shipped offsite and sent for metals reclamation or disposal. If it is going for disposal, it will have to be characterized to determine if 1) it is a hazardous waste, which it is most of the time, and 2) it meets the applicable Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs). It would have to be treated, as part of disposal, to meet the LDRs.
Read more

(2013) Question 16: What is the typical carbon monoxide (CO) concentration in the reformer net gas? How is the CO content measured? What are the potential effects to downstream units from the CO?

Carbon monoxide can form in reformer units as the hydrocarbon reacts with moisture under very low-unit pressure conditions. Typically, semi-regeneration reformer net gas would have nil CO and only a minimal amount in a CCR-type unit. I expect it to probably be on the order of 5 ppm (parts per million), though some units report routine measurements of 10 to 20 ppm CO in their net hydrogen off gas.
Read more

(2013) Question 17: How many continuous reforming operators have completed a catalyst change while the unit continues to operate? What variables should be taken into account when planning such a change?

HollyFrontier has two CCRs: one at Tulsa that was converted from a semi-regeneration reformer and one at Artesia. We have not done a catalyst change at the Tulsa refinery CCR, but we have done an online catalyst change at Artesia.
Read more

(2013) Question 18: What are some typical causes for high pressure drop across regenerator dust collectors in continuous reforming units? Is anyone using continuous blowback on the bags?

The obvious answer to the high-pressure drop would seem to be that you have too many fines on the bags. But realistically, why do you get too many fines? The causes could be that you waited too long to do the reverse jet blowing or, a less common cause, that you are getting hydrocarbon carryover which is causing the fines to clump together on the bags.
Read more

(2013) Question 19: How are refiners managing low-coke operations in continuous reforming?

There are two ways to address the issue: 1) try to increase the coke that you are making and 2) adjust the regenerator. It would be great if you could just adjust how much coke you are making. However, most of the time you are restricted in what you can do with the unit, given your octane targets and the feed flows and qualities are fixed.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 31
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Current page 35
  • Page 36
  • Page 37
  • Page 38
  • Page 39
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top