Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Operational Excellence Programs
My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Operational Excellence Programs
    • Safety Portal, Now MyAFPM
    • Alkylation Safety
    • FCC Process Safety Regional Workshops
    • Human & Organizational Performance
    • Walk the Line
    • Walk the Job
    • Q&A Database
    • Safety Statistics and Reports
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Feed Quality
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
  • Crude/Coking
    • Mechanical
    • Process
  • FCC

Year QA

  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
  • (-) 2019
  • (-) 2012
Search Filters

Process

  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Feed Quality
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
  • Crude/Coking
    • Mechanical
    • Process
  • FCC

Year QA

  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
  • (-) 2019
  • (-) 2012
Filters

(2012) Question 95: What is the recommended Best Practice regarding the design of catalyst loading and unloading lines with respect to metallurgy, size, run lengths, bends/Ts, cleanout connections, etc.?

KBR’s Best Practice is to fabricate the main catalyst loading and unloading lines with carbon steel. To protect the carbon steel lines against elevated regenerator temperatures, KBR recommends that Operations personnel only de-inventory the converter after the catalyst has been cooled below 650°F.
Read more

(2012) Question 96: What is the CO boiler start-up and shutdown sequence with respect to the FCCU start-up and shutdown timing? What are the reasons for this sequence?

As I mentioned briefly in an earlier question, most of our FCCs with CO boilers start-up with the CO boilers bypassed. If we run partial-burn on any of these FCCs, we tend to start-up in full-burn at reduced rates. Once the feed is in the unit and considered stable, most sites will cut into their CO boiler with the process flow.
Read more

(2012) Question 97: What equipment do you employ to help eliminate ESP hopper and downcomer plugging with catalyst fines? What additional operating practices are used? What type of level detectors are in use on the ESP hoppers and/or catalyst storage silos? Are there any new level detection technologies that could be applied, perhaps from coke drum measurement detectors?

Our main problem with the ESP is fines accumulation in both the ESP hoppers and the transfer line from the hoppers to the fine's storage bin. We have incorporated some design improvements that have helped us minimize, but not completely eliminate, the main problems of condensation in the system and plugging.
Read more

(2012) Question 98: What is your experience with the use of ammonia or steam in the FCC flue gas line in order to improve the operation of the ESP? Please comment on system configuration and operational issues

We have extensive experience with the use of ammonia in the FCC flue gas line in order to improve the conductivity of the particles and improve the operation of the ESP. We inject ammonia at the target level of 10 parts per million or less.
Read more

(2012) Question 99: Have refineries experienced an increase in particulate emissions in the regenerator flue gas caused by oxygen enrichment of air to the regenerator?

We have quite a few refineries that use oxygen enrichment. One of them uses it in very high concentration. None of the sites – and I spoke with them specifically about this – say that they have seen an increase in particulate emissions as a result of increasing their oxygen enrichment.
Read more

(2012) Question 5: Reforming of feedstocks from ‘tight oil’ crudes offers unique challenges such as low naphthene and aromatic (N+A) content, lighter feed, and differences in coke yield.What are refiners doing to address these challenges and generate opportunities for these new crudes?

From a project standpoint, there have been inquiries related to tight oil and proposals generated, but not a significant number of actual projects realized for revamping units. It appears that most refiners are able to accommodate the tight oil in their existing units. Some of this accommodation has to do with the naphtha area capacity issues in the U.S. of which I am sure everyone is aware.
Read more

(2012) Question 41: Have the panel members considered 15% ethanol (E15) gasoline blending?

My first slide shows a little background. The EPA administers the Renewable Fuel Standard program that has volume requirements for renewable fuels.
Read more

(2012) Question 42: What options are available to produce on-spec jet fuel from high total acid number (TAN) sources? What impacts these choices?

Regarding the conventional hydrotreating, I do not think high TAN would be an issue; but if you try to caustic-treat high TAN material, you will end up with what amounts to be the equivalent of lye soap. So anywhere you want oil and water separation to take place, the soap components may cause rag layers and carryover.
Read more

(2012) Question 43: In reforming units, what equipment could be susceptible to high temperature hydrogen attack (HTHA)? How are panelists approaching evaluation and replacement of equipment that could be susceptible to HTHA?

First, a little background: API 941 discusses high temperature hydrogen attack. At low temperatures, less than about 430°F, carbon steel has been used successfully up to 10,000 psi. But with elevated temperatures, the molecular hydrogen will dissociate into atomic hydrogen, which can readily enter and diffuse into the steel.
Read more

(2012) Question 45: What is the maximum allowable limit for the iron content of a reforming catalyst? Is this limit the same for semi-regenerative and continuously-regenerative catalysts?

We have seen that the maximum allowable iron on catalyst cannot be reduced to a simple number. Historically, about 3,000 wppm is the level at which we see yield start to suffer, but not every wppm of iron has the same impact on the unit. Iron deposited on the surface of the catalyst, usually from corrosion-related byproducts, tends to have less of an impact on the overall performance.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Current page 21
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2026 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top