Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • Gasoline Processing
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Reforming
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • Desalting
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Feed Quality
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
  • FCC
    • Environmental
    • Alkylation
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • Corrosion
    • Distillation
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Process

Submitter

  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • (-) Operator
  • (-) Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • Gasoline Processing
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Reforming
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • Desalting
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Feed Quality
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
  • FCC
    • Environmental
    • Alkylation
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • Corrosion
    • Distillation
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Process

Submitter

  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • (-) Operator
  • (-) Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2010) Question 45: In Udex extraction units, what options (process variables / solvent composition / solvent type) do you employ to improve aromatic recovery without compromising unit capacity?

In Udex extraction units, what options (process variables / solvent composition / solvent type) do you employ to improve aromatic recovery without compromising unit capacity?
Read more

(2010) Question 46: What is the panel's experience with in-line blending and in-line certification? What are the main differences between in-line blending and certification?

For clarity, a common definition of “in-line blending” is required. Marathon defines in-line blending as a system that pumps multiple blend components from individual tanks, which are typically “live” (either receiving or capable of receiving components from a process unit or pipeline delivery) into a header. The header generally contains static mixing to ensure homogeneity of the blend.
Read more

(2010) Question 47: What are the best practices for corrosion probe selection, installation and reliability, especially in high temperature and/or high H2S environments?

Some things to consider when selecting and installing corrosion probes are to match the metallurgy of the probe to the pipe.
Read more

(2010) Question 48: In your experience, what is the preferred online (non-destructive) method to identify risk of HIC (hydrogen induced cracking) in gasoline processing units?

The preferred method of identifying the risk of hydrogen induced cracking is to measure the permeation or flux of hydrogen on the outside surface of the equipment and correlate this to the corrosion rate on the inside of the pipe.
Read more

(2008) Question 90: What determines the minimum feedrate for a fixed bed reformer? What process indicators would tell you that the feedrate is too low?

Question 90: What determines the minimum feedrate for a fixed bed reformer? What process indicators would tell you that the feedrate is too low? Rick Grubb (Chevron USA) Besides mechanical limitations, such as pump capacities, flowmeter ranges, control valve sizes, etc., the process factors that determine the minimum feed rate of a fixed-bed reformer are: •Flow distribution in the reactors •Heat of reaction dissipation in reactors •Flow distribution in furnaces •Phase separation in exchangers
Read more

(2008) Question 91: In a catalytic reformer with a given pressure, severity, and feed quality (N+2A), what are the major factors that determine the C5+ yield? How do you optimize yield? Have you quantified the impact of pentane and/or hexane content in the feed?

Question 91: In a catalytic reformer with a given pressure, severity, and feed quality (N+2A), what are the major factors that determine the C5+ yield? How do you optimize yield? Have you quantified the impact of pentane and/or hexane content in the feed? Michael Newton (Roddey Engineering) Setting pressure, severity, and feed quality limits you on any significant “knobs to turn” in determining the C5+ yield. If you assume that LHSV is also fixed, there are two factors that can impact C5+ yield. Reactor Inlet Temperature Profile – typically running a “downhill” profile will give you a slightly higher C5+ yield and will lower overall coke make in the unit. Water Chloride balance – having an over-chlorided catalyst will result in more cracking and lower C5+ yields. Under-chlorided – higher deactivation, higher yield, higher temp required.
Read more

(2008) Question 92: What criteria do you use to determine end of run (EOR) catalyst life for a CCR? How many regeneration cycles have you achieved between catalyst replacements?

Question 92: What criteria do you use to determine end of run (EOR) catalyst life for a CCR? How many regeneration cycles have you achieved between catalyst replacements? Willie Morrissette/Joe Zmich (UOP LLC) There are a number of considerations in determining the End of Run for a catalyst cycle in CCR operations. Refinery economics are typically the ultimate factor used for determining when to replace CCR Reforming catalysts. The useful life of a CCR catalyst is impacted by the operation of the unit and is a function of the ability to maintain the proper metal and acid function of the catalyst as well as the condition of the catalyst base. UOP’s CCR PlatformingTM catalyst can achieve very long life because UOP reactor and regenerator operate at optimum conditions.
Read more

(2008) Question 94: In monitoring catalytic reformer operation, how often do you perform a feed/product analysis and what analytical methods do you use? How often do you perform a mass balance and what is the acceptable mass balance closure? What is a typical mass balance closure?

Question 94: In monitoring catalytic reformer operation, how often do you perform a feed/product analysis and what analytical methods do you use? How often do you perform a mass balance and what is the acceptable mass balance closure? What is a typical mass balance closure? Michael Newton (Roddey Engineering) Units were the feed properties are relatively constant need to be monitored much less than those were the properties change often. For material balances during performance evaluation, accuracy should be within +/-1%. For daily monitoring, +/-2% is acceptable. All balances and monitoring require good data from the lab and making sure that meter data is input and calculations performed correctly.
Read more

(2008) Question 95: How often do you perform CCR and cyclic reformer turnarounds? What determines the turnaround interval? What actions can you take to extend the turnaround cycle?

Question 95: How often do you perform CCR and cyclic reformer turnarounds? What determines the turnaround interval? What actions can you take to extend the turnaround cycle? Javier Quintana (Valero Energy) Valero’s best practice guideline for reformer turnarounds is currently 4-6 years, but eventually we will target 10 years. With the longer turnaround horizon, catalyst condition in a CCR unit can be managed with on-the-fly change out, which has been demonstrated several times in practice, while in cyclic units, a reactor can be changed out while the remainder of the unit is operating.
Read more

(2008) Question 96: How do you manage sulfur in the feed to a catalytic reformer? What is the minimum allowable sulfur for CCR, semi-regen, and cyclic reformer feeds? What are your sampling frequencies and allowable ranges? What is your experience with carburization and/or metal-catalyzed coking?

Question 96: How do you manage sulfur in the feed to a catalytic reformer? What is the minimum allowable sulfur for CCR, semi-regen, and cyclic reformer feeds? What are your sampling frequencies and allowable ranges? What is your experience with carburization and/or metal-catalyzed coking? Joe Zmich (UOP LLC) UOP has extensively researched the tendency of metal surfaces to promote coke formation. UOP will provide specific recommendations on operating guidelines based on unit design and operating conditions. We are aware of two fixed bed units that have each operated with feed sulfur below 0.05 wppm and experienced coke growth in the reactors. Subsequent operation with a target of 0.15 wppm S successfully prevented repeat coke growth. Most fixed bed reforming catalyst systems must be properly sulfided following regeneration to attenuate the catalyst metal function.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Current page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top