Filters

(2008) Question 91: In a catalytic reformer with a given pressure, severity, and feed quality (N+2A), what are the major factors that determine the C5+ yield? How do you optimize yield? Have you quantified the impact of pentane and/or hexane content in the feed?

Question 91: In a catalytic reformer with a given pressure, severity, and feed quality (N+2A), what are the major factors that determine the C5+ yield? How do you optimize yield? Have you quantified the impact of pentane and/or hexane content in the feed? Michael Newton (Roddey Engineering) Setting pressure, severity, and feed quality limits you on any significant “knobs to turn” in determining the C5+ yield. If you assume that LHSV is also fixed, there are two factors that can impact C5+ yield. Reactor Inlet Temperature Profile – typically running a “downhill” profile will give you a slightly higher C5+ yield and will lower overall coke make in the unit. Water Chloride balance – having an over-chlorided catalyst will result in more cracking and lower C5+ yields. Under-chlorided – higher deactivation, higher yield, higher temp required.
Read more

(2008) Question 92: What criteria do you use to determine end of run (EOR) catalyst life for a CCR? How many regeneration cycles have you achieved between catalyst replacements?

Question 92: What criteria do you use to determine end of run (EOR) catalyst life for a CCR? How many regeneration cycles have you achieved between catalyst replacements? Willie Morrissette/Joe Zmich (UOP LLC) There are a number of considerations in determining the End of Run for a catalyst cycle in CCR operations. Refinery economics are typically the ultimate factor used for determining when to replace CCR Reforming catalysts. The useful life of a CCR catalyst is impacted by the operation of the unit and is a function of the ability to maintain the proper metal and acid function of the catalyst as well as the condition of the catalyst base. UOP’s CCR PlatformingTM catalyst can achieve very long life because UOP reactor and regenerator operate at optimum conditions.
Read more

(2008) Question 94: In monitoring catalytic reformer operation, how often do you perform a feed/product analysis and what analytical methods do you use? How often do you perform a mass balance and what is the acceptable mass balance closure? What is a typical mass balance closure?

Question 94: In monitoring catalytic reformer operation, how often do you perform a feed/product analysis and what analytical methods do you use? How often do you perform a mass balance and what is the acceptable mass balance closure? What is a typical mass balance closure? Michael Newton (Roddey Engineering) Units were the feed properties are relatively constant need to be monitored much less than those were the properties change often. For material balances during performance evaluation, accuracy should be within +/-1%. For daily monitoring, +/-2% is acceptable. All balances and monitoring require good data from the lab and making sure that meter data is input and calculations performed correctly.
Read more

(2008) Question 95: How often do you perform CCR and cyclic reformer turnarounds? What determines the turnaround interval? What actions can you take to extend the turnaround cycle?

Question 95: How often do you perform CCR and cyclic reformer turnarounds? What determines the turnaround interval? What actions can you take to extend the turnaround cycle? Javier Quintana (Valero Energy) Valero’s best practice guideline for reformer turnarounds is currently 4-6 years, but eventually we will target 10 years. With the longer turnaround horizon, catalyst condition in a CCR unit can be managed with on-the-fly change out, which has been demonstrated several times in practice, while in cyclic units, a reactor can be changed out while the remainder of the unit is operating.
Read more

(2008) Question 96: How do you manage sulfur in the feed to a catalytic reformer? What is the minimum allowable sulfur for CCR, semi-regen, and cyclic reformer feeds? What are your sampling frequencies and allowable ranges? What is your experience with carburization and/or metal-catalyzed coking?

Question 96: How do you manage sulfur in the feed to a catalytic reformer? What is the minimum allowable sulfur for CCR, semi-regen, and cyclic reformer feeds? What are your sampling frequencies and allowable ranges? What is your experience with carburization and/or metal-catalyzed coking? Joe Zmich (UOP LLC) UOP has extensively researched the tendency of metal surfaces to promote coke formation. UOP will provide specific recommendations on operating guidelines based on unit design and operating conditions. We are aware of two fixed bed units that have each operated with feed sulfur below 0.05 wppm and experienced coke growth in the reactors. Subsequent operation with a target of 0.15 wppm S successfully prevented repeat coke growth. Most fixed bed reforming catalyst systems must be properly sulfided following regeneration to attenuate the catalyst metal function.
Read more

(2008) Question 97: What technologies and adsorbents are you using for net hydrogen off gas chloride traps and what operating problems have you experienced? What are the criteria for changing out the adsorbents and how often are the beds changed?

Question 97: What technologies and adsorbents are you using for net hydrogen off gas chloride traps and what operating problems have you experienced? What are the criteria for changing out the adsorbents and how often are the beds changed? Javier Quintana (Valero Energy) There are various adsorbents available for effective chloride treating of the hydrogen-rich net gas stream, including activated aluminas, promoted aluminas, and zeolites. Valero has moved away from the alumina products towards a best practice of using the zeolite products, not only for reasons of cost per quantity of chloride removed, but also for ease of changeout and completeness of chloride removal.
Read more

(2008) Question 98: What metallurgy are you using for mesh pads in reformer compressor suction knockout drums? How often are the mesh pads inspected and how often are they replaced? Are the same criteria used for mesh pads in product separators?

Question 98 What metallurgy are you using for mesh pads in reformer compressor suction knockout drums? How often are the mesh pads inspected and how often are they replaced? Are the same criteria used for mesh pads in product separators? Rick Grubb (Chevron USA) We typically use 304 SS demister pads in the refinery and inspect them every 10 years. In reforming service we have been using Tefzel demister pads and have been replacing them approximately every dump and screen due to separator internal inspections. If we go into the vessel we go ahead and inspect the mesh pad, but assume before opening the vessel that the pad will need replacing. The Tefzel pads have greatly increased the reliability such that we don’t find mesh pad pieces in the compressors anymore. We have been contemplating using co-knit pads (synthetic fiber inter-woven with a SS fiber), but have not done so yet.
Read more

(2008) Question 1: What are your experiences taking reactor effluent samples? What safety issues do you consider when taking samples? What do you consider to be best practices?

Question 1: What are your experiences taking reactor effluent samples? What safety issues do you consider when taking samples? What do you consider to be best practices? Edwin Yuh (UOP) UOP has traditionally included sampling capability in our licensed units when there are multiple reactor systems. For example, a sample point is typically installed at the pretreat reactor outlet before the cracking reactor in hydrocracking units to measure nitrogen slip. Many UOP licensees collect reactor effluent samples routinely. Quite a few recently licensed units are designed as integrated hydroprocessing units processing different feeds with different catalyst systems.
Read more

(2008) Question 2: Do you re-evaluate your unit operating procedures at regular intervals? How often? What principles/standards are these procedures reviewed against?

Question 2: Do you re-evaluate your unit operating procedures at regular intervals? How often? What principles/standards are these procedures reviewed against? David Rapavi (HOVENSA) HOVENSA reviews and re-issues unit operating procedures in accordance with OSHA Standard 1910.119 paragraph (f)(3), which states “Operating procedures shall be reviewed as often as necessary to assure that they reflect current operating practice, including changes that result from changes in process chemicals, technology and equipment, and changes to facilities.
Read more