Q&A

(2011) Question 40: Are there instances where mercaptan treatment of refinery gasoline or naphtha streams is necessary? What are the applicable treatment methods?

As mercaptans are sulfur-bearing compounds, they are one among numerous target species for sulfur removal from naphtha or gasoline streams to meet reactor feed or finished product sulfur specifications.

(2011) Question 45: What tools are you using to predict the yields of Xylene, Benzene, Toluene and other aromatics in a catalytic reformer? What methods do you use and how often do you test the feedstock for these variables? Other than feedstock quality, what factors are you accounting for in the individual yields (unit pressure, RON, etc)? Do you have any rules of thumb for conversion of certain species of aromatics?

Dedicated simulators are run for prediction, either using correlations or kinetic models. To be able to perform accurate predictions, feed analyses shall be performed every time the feedstock quality is changed: the most important one is detailed hydrocarbon analysis by gas chromatography (for instance Carburane).

(2016) Question 18: The increased production of light straight-run (LSR) from crude units is likely to have an impact on refiners’plans for Tier 3 compliance. What strategies do you employ in order to manage this issue?

Tier 3 drives hydrotreating of essentially all light naphtha streams. Since most United States refineries have FCCs, it is usually desirable to hydrotreat other gasoline streams more completely to minimize the FCC naphtha olefin saturation and the associated octane loss

(2016) Question 25: For refinery complexes considering grassroots or brownfield expansion of gas oil conversion capacity, what are your typical capital expenditure (capex) costs and relative refinery margin improvement between FCC (fluid catalytic cracking) and hydrocracking? What are the key technology features that impact your economic decision? What are the crucial considerations that, if they include both technologies, to allow for future integration, especially around the changing gasoline/diese

In general, Marathon’s economic viewpoint is that hydrocrackers have better projected margins going forward than FCCUs, as they maximize higher valued ULSD over gasoline and have higher volume expansion (see Figure 1). This is driven by many factors mentioned in the primary response and is particularly attractive when ULSD is strong relative to gasoline and when natural gas or hydrogen) is inexpensive. Each company has a different viewpoint on this topic, so the opinion will vary somewhat across the industry.

(2010) Question 61: In your experience, what is the effect of crude oil compatibility on crude unit preheat exchanger fouling? Are there any correlations used to predict fouling?

Since there are only isolated instances of fouling in the “cold train” exchangers prior to the desalter(s), we will assume this question is directed more towards the “hot train” exchangers.

(2010) Question 62: What are the refiners experiences using static mixers in place of, or in conjunction with, traditional mixing valves at the desalter?

Years ago, many refiners installed static mixers in desalters, as opposed to traditional mix valves, to improve contacting of water and oil at a lower pressure drop. In theory, this was a good idea, but in practice it has not worked well.

(2010) Question 63: Certain crudes are treated with H2S scavenger to meet a 10 ppm or less specification in the vapor space. In your experience, what is the disposition of the reacted and unreacted scavenger additive through the crude unit? Will this product and/or associated byproducts create corrosion or product quality issues in the crude unit or downstream units?

The majority of H2S scavengers used today are water-soluble, cyclic amines which can quickly react with H2S, forming a water-soluble reaction product. However, these amine-based scavengers are not without potential problems. As formulated, these scavengers often contain un-reacted amines.

(2018) Question 31: How does emulsion breaker performance compare when injected in the crude or wash water? What is your method to inject emulsion breaker for 2 stage desalters?

For the desalter system as a whole, the typical emulsion breaker is injected into the crude stream as far upstream as possible in order to provide intimate contact. In this case, the emulsion breaker is one that has a hydrocarbon solvent and so is hydrophilic which wants to stay in the oil phase. There are cases where injecting this emulsion breaker into the water phase can help reduce the impact of surfactants that surround the water droplets.

(2018) Question 32: Have you developed processes to successfully extract the emulsion layer from the desalter, so the emulsion can be treated separately? Please describe your chemical treatment programs and equipment that have been implemented successfully to treat this extracted emulsion.

Emulsion extraction headers, sometimes called cuff headers, have been an option and have been installed in desalters for decades. The removal of the emulsion layer solves one problem and creates another as this emulsion layer can be very difficult to treat.

(2018) Question 33: When processing cracked stocks in a crude unit, what potential issues do you expect? What changes in operations or treatment programs can you mitigate these issues?

If the site does not have a Delayed Coker, then reprocessing cracked stocks through the FCC fractionator is the next option. Again, this keeps the cracked materials separate from the straight run products.

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

Q&A