Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Catalysts
    • Environmental
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Reforming
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
    • Aromatics
    • Blending
  • Crude/Coking
    • Corrosion
    • Distillation
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Process
  • Hydroprocessing

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • (-) Vendor

Year QA

  • 2010
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Catalysts
    • Environmental
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Reforming
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
    • Aromatics
    • Blending
  • Crude/Coking
    • Corrosion
    • Distillation
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Process
  • Hydroprocessing

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • (-) Vendor

Year QA

  • 2010
Filters

(2010) Question 71: For the main column, "tri lines" can be utilized to monitor bottoms level. When other level instruments are being verified or have failed, what are the best operating and safety practices being employed to verify the level? What do refiners use to monitor and control level in the bottom of the main column?

For the main column, "tri lines" can be utilized to monitor bottoms level. When other level instruments are being verified or have failed, what are the best operating and safety practices being employed to verify the level? What do refiners use to monitor and control level in the bottom of the main column?
Read more

(2010) Question 80: What best practices do you recommend to improve LCO recovery? Do changes in LCO pump around affect LCO recovery? What are common challenges?

There has been a lot of work and discussion on LCO maximization at the FCCU and there is plenty of literature on different options for LCO recovery. This will be a general overview of available options to refiners and some challenges recently experienced at Coffeyville.
Read more

(2010) Question 85: What is the typical range that you employ for iron content on FCC equilibrium catalyst? What methods are available to determine how iron is accumulated on the catalyst surface? How does the distribution of iron on the catalyst surface impact the FCC operation, yield structure and emissions?

There are several methods available to quantify iron contamination on catalyst. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) pictures are a valuable means to qualitatively assess iron laydown morphology on the catalyst particle.
Read more

(2010) Question 29: What technologies do you use for treating or recovering VOCs from small-scale truck loading terminals? Discuss the merits associated with each?

The three main VOC treating systems for small scale truck loading are vapor combustion system, flare gas recovery unit, and an adsorption/absorption vapor recovery system.
Read more

(2010) Question 33: How do refiners avoid De-isobutanizer (DIB) column/reboiler fouling in sulfuric acid alkylation? What process conditions on the column do you use to detect this fouling? What process modifications do you take to minimize the impact of this fouling?

Fouling in the DIB column is almost always caused by salt deposits. These salts are typically sodium sulfate and sodium sulfite but can also contain calcium or magnesium if the effluent treating water is not demineralized. If these water-soluble salts are present in the DIB feed, the water will evaporate once inside the column leaving the solids behind.
Read more

Question 3: Carbonate stress corrosion cracking (CSCC) has been identified as a cause of failure in FCC main fractionator overhead systems. What changes in feed quality, unit operation, or configuration would lead to increased risk of CSCC? What parameters do you monitor to determine whether a system is susceptible to CSCC? Has the problem been significant enough to warrant either comprehensive PWHT in potentially affected areas or localized PWHT when problem areas are identified?

Carbonate stress corrosion cracking, CSCC, is characterized by inter-granular, sometimes branchy, scale-filled cracks. It is believed that ammonium carbonate is the main contributor to the cracking mechanism.
Read more

Question 7: Is your company either considering, or actually implementing, FCC projects that include reduced CO2 emissions (greenhouse gas reduction-GHGR) as an offset/credit?

We do not have any current FCC projects that plan on utilizing some form of CO2 offset or credit in the emissions analysis. ConocoPhillips has performed a limited modeling study to evaluate the effect of operational changes on CO2 emissions from the FCC. Also, the study indicated that there is very little you can do to reduce overall emissions without also overall significantly reducing unit throughput or conversion.
Read more

Question 10: What is your recent experience regarding the maximum level of equilibrium catalyst metals (Ni, V, Na, Fe, Ca) in FCC units processing residual feedstocks? Have there been any recent improvements in vanadium passivation technologies? At nickel levels approaching 10,000 ppm, have you experienced increased catalyst deactivation as evidenced by lower equilibrium zeolite surface area?

Here we see data regarding one of our FCCUs that operates at e-cat nickel levels exceeding 10,000 ppm. We observe that the MAT generally remains within the same range until high e-cat nickel concentrations are approached.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • Page 1
  • Current page 2
  • Page 3
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top