Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • (-) Reliability
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Vendor
  • Consultant

Year QA

  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • (-) Reliability
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Vendor
  • Consultant

Year QA

  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
Filters

(2012) Question 89: With the increase in rare earth costs, many units have decreased the rare earth oxide (REO) content or used rare earth substitutes in their FCC catalyst. What is your experience with these in terms of activity maintenance, delta coke, conversion, attrition, and yield selectivity's? How have operating conditions changed?

Rare earth stabilizes zeolite and increases hydrogen transfer. Reducing the rare earth on zeolite will decrease the catalyst activity at the same zeolite content and matrix activity.
Read more

(2012) Question 90: Can ZSM-5 be used to make propylene from high metal resid feeds? What is the effect of nickel and vanadium on this kind of operation?

ZSM-5 usage is widely used in FCC units trying to maximize propylene. ZSM-5 usage is just as popular in resid units as it is with gas oil units. We have seen high propylene yield units, resid units with feeds greater than 6 Conradson carbon residue, and e-cats that exceed 10,000 ppm nickel plus vanadium.
Read more

(2012) Question 91: What FCC turnaround intervals are refiners achieving for units that do not take mini turnarounds? Do longer intervals mean lower reliability between turnarounds?

Most of BP’s units are now transitioning from about a four-year turnaround cycle to a five-year. We have some units already running five years between turnaround cycles without necessarily showing evidence of higher wear and tear.
Read more

(2012) Question 92: Describe the turnaround scope of work for the combustion air blower. Does it differ for units with turbo expanders? Do you work on the air blower every turnaround? Is this work performed by a general turnaround contractor or by the manufacturer? How often does this work become critical path?

Most sites replace the internals of the expander during every turnaround. The stator veins are thoroughly inspected and replaced on as-needed basis.
Read more

(2012) Question 93: How do you manage regenerator cyclone life to ensure that you reach target turnaround intervals? Do you consider superficial velocity, inlet velocity, inlet loading, outlet velocity, etc.?

At KBR, we specify design parameters that will allow the operator to achieve extended regenerator cyclone life for several turnaround intervals. Based on our experience, it was shown that most cyclone problems are attributed to operating above the maximum recommended velocities. KBR recommends that Operations maintain a cyclone inlet velocity below 70 fps and 80 fps for the first- and second-stage cyclones respectively.
Read more

(2012) Question 94: What is your experience using specially designed automated isolation valves on the reactor overhead line for your de-blinding operation during the start-up of the FCCU? Will they dependably provide positive isolation after being in operation? How did you justify the installation cost (e.g., safety and economics)?

We have quite a few units that use valves in the vapor line and others with just simple blocked valves in that service. Two more units now have a newer style: a double disc valve which relies, in part, on a steam purge to provide positive isolation. Because that valve was very successful, two more valves are going to be installed soon.
Read more

(2012) Question 95: What is the recommended Best Practice regarding the design of catalyst loading and unloading lines with respect to metallurgy, size, run lengths, bends/Ts, cleanout connections, etc.?

KBR’s Best Practice is to fabricate the main catalyst loading and unloading lines with carbon steel. To protect the carbon steel lines against elevated regenerator temperatures, KBR recommends that Operations personnel only de-inventory the converter after the catalyst has been cooled below 650°F.
Read more

(2012) Question 96: What is the CO boiler start-up and shutdown sequence with respect to the FCCU start-up and shutdown timing? What are the reasons for this sequence?

As I mentioned briefly in an earlier question, most of our FCCs with CO boilers start-up with the CO boilers bypassed. If we run partial-burn on any of these FCCs, we tend to start-up in full-burn at reduced rates. Once the feed is in the unit and considered stable, most sites will cut into their CO boiler with the process flow.
Read more

(2012) Question 97: What equipment do you employ to help eliminate ESP hopper and downcomer plugging with catalyst fines? What additional operating practices are used? What type of level detectors are in use on the ESP hoppers and/or catalyst storage silos? Are there any new level detection technologies that could be applied, perhaps from coke drum measurement detectors?

Our main problem with the ESP is fines accumulation in both the ESP hoppers and the transfer line from the hoppers to the fine's storage bin. We have incorporated some design improvements that have helped us minimize, but not completely eliminate, the main problems of condensation in the system and plugging.
Read more

(2012) Question 98: What is your experience with the use of ammonia or steam in the FCC flue gas line in order to improve the operation of the ESP? Please comment on system configuration and operational issues

We have extensive experience with the use of ammonia in the FCC flue gas line in order to improve the conductivity of the particles and improve the operation of the ESP. We inject ammonia at the target level of 10 parts per million or less.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 36
  • Page 37
  • Page 38
  • Page 39
  • Page 40
  • Page 41
  • Page 42
  • Current page 43
  • Page 44
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top