Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • (-) CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Vendor
  • Consultant

Year QA

  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • (-) CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Vendor
  • Consultant

Year QA

  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
Filters

(2010) Question 80: What best practices do you recommend to improve LCO recovery? Do changes in LCO pump around affect LCO recovery? What are common challenges?

There has been a lot of work and discussion on LCO maximization at the FCCU and there is plenty of literature on different options for LCO recovery. This will be a general overview of available options to refiners and some challenges recently experienced at Coffeyville.
Read more

(2010) Question 81: Refiners operating FCCUs producing high levels of propylene have seen different or excessive product contaminants when compared to a less severe operation. In your experience, how has this impacted gasoline or LPG treating unit? What specific contaminants have you identified? What impact have you seen in amine color, consumption, or foaming tendency? What actions have you taken that have mitigated or prevented treating unit issues?

The answer to this question depends on what is considered high levels of propylene and what is the method to achieve it. If the additional propylene is produced by the addition of ZSM-5 to a standard operation, then I would not expect to see additional effects of contaminants. However, if the propylene production is increased through higher severity, ROT, bottoms cracking, etc., then there will be additional contaminant issues.
Read more

(2010) Question 82: Immediately after startup of the FCCU, we experienced a hot spot in the regenerator dome and flue gas system. Do you know of any "on the run" acceptable mitigations? Should steam and/or water sprays be applied to the impacted area? Are there reliable analytical techniques to determine if and when the unit should be shutdown for repairs?

Hot Spots are an unfortunate but common problem in cold walled FCC converter vessels and transfer lines. Hot Spots which are not treated can lead to several undesirable effects to the steel envelope. Most refiners typically mitigate these effects by applying steam to the localized hot area.
Read more

(2010) Question 84: Please describe the function of the critical flow nozzle in relation to the operation of a third stage separator. What are the key process/operations/maintenance considerations you associate with the performance of the nozzle? Can poor performance result in a unit shutdown?

The critical flow nozzle (CFN) is located on the underflow line of the Third Stage Separator (TSS). The purpose of the critical flow nozzle is to continuously help blow down cat fines separated in the TSS. The nozzle is normally designed for 2-4% flue gas and designed to take the same pressure drop as the Expander.
Read more

(2010) Question 85: What is the typical range that you employ for iron content on FCC equilibrium catalyst? What methods are available to determine how iron is accumulated on the catalyst surface? How does the distribution of iron on the catalyst surface impact the FCC operation, yield structure and emissions?

There are several methods available to quantify iron contamination on catalyst. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) pictures are a valuable means to qualitatively assess iron laydown morphology on the catalyst particle.
Read more

(2010) Question 86: In your experience, what are catalyst best practices to shift FCC yields rapidly between gasoline and diesel maximization and then back again? Many catalyst suppliers are recommending blended catalyst systems. Do you believe this catalyst/additive blending is the best approach?

Co-catalysts are a new product category providing the refiner with the flexibility to change the product slate of the FCC without changing the FCC catalyst. Changing between a maximum gasoline co-catalyst and a maximum LCO co-catalyst will allow the refiner to rapidly capture the most favorable economics at all times – maximizing FCC profitability. Co-catalysts are added to the base catalyst to rapidly change the core performance of the FCC.
Read more

(2010) Question 87: In your experience, how does catalyst activity affect the catalyst's coke selectivity and the FCCU's delta coke? How are the coke selectivity and delta coke related? Lastly, discuss how to determine the proper activity to maximize conversion.

When designing an FCC catalyst, one must consider coke selectivity, delta coke and total coke yield. Coke selectivity is the relative coke-making tendency of the catalyst, or in other words, a catalyst with good coke selectivity produces higher conversion per unit of coke make than the reference catalyst.
Read more

(2010) Question 88: What options exist for the disposition of FCC equilibrium catalyst and fines? For refineries processing residual feedstocks, what are the limitations on the contaminate levels for the various disposal options?

E-cat and ESP hopper fines are either send to a cement kiln or land filled. Fines captured by the Wet Gas Scrubber are also land filled. Metals limits are normally for leachable metals as measured by the TCLP (Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure) testing, as opposed to total metals in the catalyst.
Read more

(2010) Question 89: In shifting from partial burn to full burn in a side by side unit, what has been your observed impact on the NOx emissions? What is necessary to achieve 20 ppm NOx?

Several Grace customers successfully operate with NOx emissions less than 20 ppm in full combustion without the use of NOx removal hardware in the flue gas circuit.
Read more

(2010) Question 90: Does any refiner use an on-line particulate emissions (PM) analyzer to measure PM concentration and/or particle size distribution in the flue gas? Are any of these analyzers using continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS)? How reliable and accurate have these systems been?

Sunoco currently has a particulate matter (PM) analyzer in one location on the stack of a Wet Gas Scrubber. It is there to measure Filterable PM only, not particle size distribution. This was installed as a requirement of a local environmental permit.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Page 36
  • Page 37
  • Current page 38
  • Page 39
  • Page 40
  • Page 41
  • Page 42
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top