Filters

(2011) Question 45: What tools are you using to predict the yields of Xylene, Benzene, Toluene and other aromatics in a catalytic reformer? What methods do you use and how often do you test the feedstock for these variables? Other than feedstock quality, what factors are you accounting for in the individual yields (unit pressure, RON, etc)? Do you have any rules of thumb for conversion of certain species of aromatics?

Dedicated simulators are run for prediction, either using correlations or kinetic models. To be able to perform accurate predictions, feed analyses shall be performed every time the feedstock quality is changed: the most important one is detailed hydrocarbon analysis by gas chromatography (for instance Carburane).
Read more

(2016) Question 18: The increased production of light straight-run (LSR) from crude units is likely to have an impact on refiners’plans for Tier 3 compliance. What strategies do you employ in order to manage this issue?

Tier 3 drives hydrotreating of essentially all light naphtha streams. Since most United States refineries have FCCs, it is usually desirable to hydrotreat other gasoline streams more completely to minimize the FCC naphtha olefin saturation and the associated octane loss
Read more

(2016) Question 25: For refinery complexes considering grassroots or brownfield expansion of gas oil conversion capacity, what are your typical capital expenditure (capex) costs and relative refinery margin improvement between FCC (fluid catalytic cracking) and hydrocracking? What are the key technology features that impact your economic decision? What are the crucial considerations that, if they include both technologies, to allow for future integration, especially around the changing gasoline/diese

In general, Marathon’s economic viewpoint is that hydrocrackers have better projected margins going forward than FCCUs, as they maximize higher valued ULSD over gasoline and have higher volume expansion (see Figure 1). This is driven by many factors mentioned in the primary response and is particularly attractive when ULSD is strong relative to gasoline and when natural gas or hydrogen) is inexpensive. Each company has a different viewpoint on this topic, so the opinion will vary somewhat across the industry.
Read more

(2016) Question 12: What operating strategies do you employ to successfully regenerate catalyst in a continuous catalyst regeneration (CCR) unit with a carbon content in excess of 10 wt%?

The burn zone in a Honeywell UOP Platforming™ CCR Regenerator is designed for operation at 5 wt.% carbon on catalyst or about 5.25 wt.% coke at the design catalyst circulation rate. We find that most units can operate normally at coke levels 40% above the design (about 7.4 wt.% coke) and some at even higher levels of coke.
Read more

(2010) Question 38: What measurements and criteria do you use to decide when to change your gas and liquid chloride absorber material? How do you determine the selection of absorber material?

For both gas and liquid service, Chevron monitors the inlet HCL/Total Chloride and replaces the adsorbent/molecular sieve based on material balance loading of chloride on the adsorber media. Chevron does monitor adsorbent outlet HCL/Total Chlorides, but as a best practice will change the adsorbent material before vendor maximum loading if breakthrough has not occurred.
Read more

(2010) Question 39: With lower severity requirements due to ethanol blending and corresponding reduced coke make in the reformer, what changes are you making in regards to reformer operation? What opportunities does this evolution present for both CCR and semi-regen units?

Increased ethanol blending has reduced the severity of the reformers on average 2 octane numbers. This has increased reformate yield and decreased hydrogen production. Although the octane boost realized by ethanol blending reduces overall pool octane requirements, minimum reformer severity may be dictated by octane requirements of premium gasoline grades, or by refinery hydrogen requirements.
Read more

(2010) Question 40: Has anyone experienced high chloride levels in off gases from the lock hopper of a pressurized regenerator? What are the consequences of the high levels (i.e. fouled burner tips)? What are ways to mitigate the problem?

Marathon has not experienced any high hydrogen chloride concentrations in Lock Hopper off gases from the two CycleMax regenerators that we operate. We have also not experienced problems with fouled burner tips due to high hydrogen chloride in the fuel gas to a heater.
Read more