Q&A

(2011) Question 45: What tools are you using to predict the yields of Xylene, Benzene, Toluene and other aromatics in a catalytic reformer? What methods do you use and how often do you test the feedstock for these variables? Other than feedstock quality, what factors are you accounting for in the individual yields (unit pressure, RON, etc)? Do you have any rules of thumb for conversion of certain species of aromatics?

Dedicated simulators are run for prediction, either using correlations or kinetic models. To be able to perform accurate predictions, feed analyses shall be performed every time the feedstock quality is changed: the most important one is detailed hydrocarbon analysis by gas chromatography (for instance Carburane).

(2011) Question 46: Ethanol blending, and benzene management has shifted refinery octane and hydrogen balances. How are you managing hydrogen demand without giving away octane? Conversely, how are you, with excess hydrogen, maximizing availability for volume swell?

Mandated ethanol blending and limits on benzene in gasoline tend to lower the ceiling on the operating severity of catalytic reformers. While lower severity operation is theoretically desirable, in practice it can constrain H2 production, and impact regenerator operation due to lower coke make, which may require operational workarounds.

(2011) Question 47: What success have you had with installing stabilizer feed chloride treaters in reducing the salt formation and frequency of water washes?

The use of promoted alumina versus zeolite in the liquid chloride treating has several issues. For aromatics operations a Zeolite chloride treater should be selected to protect the downstream aromatics solvent from organic and inorganic chloride.

(2011) Question 48: How does naphtha derived from tar sands and shale oil differ in respect to crude oil-based naphtha? What is the impact on reformer operation?

It is assumed that “shale oil” as mentioned in the question refers to oil produced from hydraulic fracturing of shale reservoirs, as opposed to oil produced from “oil shale” rock via retorting or other techniques.

(2016) Question 17: What are your strategies for managing feed sulfur to reforming units? What are the pros and cons of the different approaches?

It is desirable to have a small amount of sulfur in the feed for CCR reforming units in order to reduce the risk of metal catalyzed coke (MCC) formation and heater-tube carburization and dusting. The sulfur interacts with the chromium and the iron to form a protective layer that reduces the penetration of carbon into the metal.

(2016) Question 18: The increased production of light straight-run (LSR) from crude units is likely to have an impact on refiners’plans for Tier 3 compliance. What strategies do you employ in order to manage this issue?

Tier 3 drives hydrotreating of essentially all light naphtha streams. Since most United States refineries have FCCs, it is usually desirable to hydrotreat other gasoline streams more completely to minimize the FCC naphtha olefin saturation and the associated octane loss

(2016) Question 19: What range of sulfur targets for hydrotreated FCC gasoline do you anticipate for Tier 3 operation?

The sulfur target for hydrotreated FCC gasoline is very site dependent. But where possible, it is desirable to hydrotreat all other gasoline streams fully so that the FCC naphtha can be treated as mildly as possible. Deeper desulfurization for FCC naphtha results in increased olefin saturation with the resultant octane loss.

(2016) Question 20: When is it appropriate to neutralize austenitic stainless-steel equipment to protect against stress corrosion cracking (SCC)? What neutralization procedures and methodologies do you recommend?

Austenitic stainless steels (200-and 300-series steel) are the most common type of stainless steels. Austenite refers specifically to the geometry of the steel (face-centered cubic crystal). These types of steel are most typically recognized as non-magnetic. Austenitic steels are widely used in the industry because they have very desirable mechanical properties. Their austenitic structure is very tough and ductile down to absolute zero. They also do not lose their strength at elevated temperatures as rapidly as ferritic iron base alloys.

(2016) Question 21: What programs or systems do you employ to monitor hydrotreater furnaces and prevent tube failures and loss of containment? Can you share your experiences using technologies to implement online temperature monitoring of tube skin temperatures?

In nearly all hydroprocessing heaters, MPC has installed tubeskin thermocouples in order to provide continuous monitoring of tube metal temperatures to the DCS (distributed control system) operator. These thermocouples are strategically located in the heater at the areas with the highest estimated maximum heat flux.

(2016) Question 22: Describe your strategies for optimizing the pretreat and cracking catalyst cycles. How does this strategy vary when operating between maximum naphtha and maximum distillate modes? How does this impact catalyst selection for the next cycle?

Marathon Petroleum Company has adopted the philosophy of optimizing the hydrotreater and hydrocracking catalyst together as one unit. We do not measure nitrogen slip from the hydrotreater section, but rather allow the hydrocracker apparent conversion dictate adjustments to the pretreat section.

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

Q&A