Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • (-) Coker
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • (-) Coker
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2013) Question 7: Given challenges in gasoline Reid vapor pressure (RVP), benzene, low-carbon fuels, and other requirements, are refiners considering expansion or other changes to make more alkylate? Has increased catalytic polymerization become a consideration?

UOP has not observed a big uptake in project activity related to this issue. However, we have observed more interest in revamping existing alkylation units rather than new projects.
Read more

(2013) Question 8: What is the industry experience with de-isobutanizer (DIB) feed pre-heatexchanger or reboiler fouling? What are the typical causes of the fouling? How do you mitigate this problem? Comment on both HF and sulfuric technologies.

I am going to talk about HF alkylation units only. The feed pre-heaters for the isostripper or main fractionator have experienced corrosion and fouling. There are several possible causes. One is getting the metallurgy, which is typically carbon steel, too hot. If you go over 160°F in the presence of HF, it gets very corrosive; so, you can lose metal that way.
Read more

(2013) Question 9: What are the latest strategies for feed dispersion and mixing in HF and sulfuric acid alkylation? How does mixing affect alkylate endpoint? Does better mixing allow for operations at reduced I/O ratios via increased olefin charge rate or operating against isobutane constraints?

I am going to address the HF units again. For the first question, it is more of an issue of, “If it ain’t broke,” we are not going to fix it. The types of mixers are simple in the HF unit. An orifice-type mixer is used for mixing the olefin and the isobutane recycle, and then a spray nozzle is used to mix the isobutane in the olefin into the acid.
Read more

(2013) Question 10: What is the industry experience with continuous online acid strength analyzers in HF and sulfuric acid services? Please comment on accuracy and reliability.

Again, I will address the HF units. UOP is aware of two vendors who are marketing online analyzers for percent HF and percent water. The experience of their customers has been generally positive. These analyzers give continuous readings, so you can detect issues much faster.
Read more

(2013) Question 11: What changes have refiners made in metallurgy from design specifications? What recommendations have the licensors incorporated into new specifications based on experience and user feedback? Comment on both HF and sulfuric acid alkylation.

The short answer is that there are not very many deviations from the design metallurgy in HF units. Any changes that have been made are based on observed corrosion rates within the unit.
Read more

(2013) Question 12: Gasoline blending is becoming more difficult due to the increases in quality specifications; lower sulfur and benzene, for example. What changes are being made to blending facilities and operations to accommodate these changes? Please discuss tankage allocations, working inventories, online analyzer needs, procedural changes, in-line blending, etc.

Blending has indeed become more difficult with the lower product specifications, but our blend methods have only experienced small evolutionary changes in response to the new specs. Most of the changes involved recertification of established methods to demonstrate compliance with the new standards.
Read more

(2013) Question 13: What are the typical causes for failing JFTOT and aviation turbine (AVTUR) specifications?

Assuming the jet fuel is on-spec with regard to other quality parameters, with the exception of perhaps copper strip corrosion and mercaptan sulfur, we have found that instability reaction precursors and catalysts are typically the root causes of JFTOT failures.
Read more

(2013) Question 14: What is industry experience of using tri-metal (platinum-rhenium with promoter) catalysts?

Promoted or multi-metallic reformer catalysts have been a topic of research since at least the early 1970s. They have been tried commercially in various forms over the years, all with the objective of improving yields by suppressing the demetallization reactions.
Read more

(2013) Question 15: What is the Best Practice process for sampling, handling, and measuring research octane (RONC) and naphthene content in reformer feed and product? Are refiners considering online RONC and/or other property monitoring?

If you have a poor octane result, the Best Practice is to blame the lab. Isn’t that what we do? The reality is that there are at least four key components of a sample system that all need some attention: sample conditioning, container contamination, sample degradation between collection and analysis, and the analysis method.
Read more

(2013) Question 16: What is the typical carbon monoxide (CO) concentration in the reformer net gas? How is the CO content measured? What are the potential effects to downstream units from the CO?

Carbon monoxide can form in reformer units as the hydrocarbon reacts with moisture under very low-unit pressure conditions. Typically, semi-regeneration reformer net gas would have nil CO and only a minimal amount in a CCR-type unit. I expect it to probably be on the order of 5 ppm (parts per million), though some units report routine measurements of 10 to 20 ppm CO in their net hydrogen off gas.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 46
  • Page 47
  • Page 48
  • Page 49
  • Page 50
  • Page 51
  • Current page 52
  • Page 53
  • Page 54
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top