Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • (-) Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Vendor
  • Consultant

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • (-) Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Vendor
  • Consultant

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2015) Question 70: With environmental regulations becoming more stringent on FCC stack emissions, what are your available options to achieve the required level of SOx (sulfur oxide) and NOx (nitrogen oxide) emissions?

From both the SOx and NOx perspective, there is a cat feed hydrotreater that will reduce both your sulfur and nitrogen compounds in the feed to your cat cracker, which will produce lower SOx and NOx emissions. It will reduce your metals in the feed and increase the hydrogen content of the feed, which will improve FCC unit conversion.
Read more

(2015) Question 71: Describe your practices for minimizing flaring and flue gas emissions during startup, shutdown, and malfunction operations?

Our Marathon FCCs all have a flareless startup procedure, but the type of equipment we have at our different FCCs varies somewhat. I pulled together an overview of what we have at our different plants and some licensor recommendations I learned through discussions I have had with them. I think we all agree that it makes sense, from a financial standpoint, to recover that material enough, whether or not the environmental stance is compelling us. It is just a part of being a good neighbor to the community in which we operate. 
Read more

(2015) Question 72: The FCC is LPG-constrained, and the refinery is octane short. What are your suggested options to increase FCC gasoline octane while minimizing any associated increase in LPG yield?

When the FCC is constrained in LPG and short on octane, the feed is one of the most important parameters for yields and quality of the yields. So, if you can, blend in more aromatic feeds. Or if you have feed pretreat, backing off from it will help improve your gasoline octane.
Read more

(2015) Question 73: Octane may become an issue as refiners increase severity on the FCC gasoline post-treatment units. What are your options available to address octane debits?

When you want to reduce the sulfur in gasoline, one of the first options you can do is undercut the gasoline. The sulfur distribution in gasoline is typically exponential. If you reduce the cutpoint of your gasoline, you will reduce the amount of sulfur in your gasoline. Sulfur exhibits an exponential distribution.
Read more

(2015) Question 74: For a unit targeting low vapor pressure gasoline, which variables have the greatest impact on isopentane production?

While the question asks specifically about isopentane production, other C5 hydrocarbons also have significant vapor pressure. Isopentane has a Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) of 20 psi (pounds per square inch); n-pentane has an RVP of 16 psi; and, the C5 olefins have RVPs between 14 and 26 psi9. For refineries desiring to minimize RVP, it is also important to minimize the quantity of C4s in the gasoline pool since C4s have even higher vapor pressures than C5s. 
Read more

(2015) Question 75: What do you recommend to either prevent the formation of carbonyl sulfide or remove it from the propylene stream? At what level does this become a concern?

Carbonyl sulfide is produced during the cracking reaction and boils slightly below propane at -50°C (-58°F). Upon post-fractionation, it concentrates predominantly in propylene. COS (carbonyl sulfide) level in FCC LPG most strongly corresponds to the sulfur in the feed.
Read more

(2015) Question 76: What has been your experience with respect to FCC flue gas analyzers using tunable diode lasers or alternatives? Any specific advantages of tunable diode laser (TDL) analyzers with respect to installation, operational service requirements, and/or reliability?

MPC does not have any TDL analyzers in FCC flue gas service. However, we do have a few installed-on process heaters that are used to measure O2, and we are happy with their performance. In FCC flue gas service, MPC has one unit that utilizes an extractive system.
Read more

(2015) Question 77: When relying primarily on FCC feed pretreating to meet FCC gasoline sulfur specifications (current or future Tier 3), how do you manage feed pretreater outages?

Marathon relies on feed pretreating for three of our FCCs, which will all continue post-Tier 3 regulation implementation. Looking at the difference between Tier 2 and Tier 3, we see that when the annual average ppm in gasoline goes down from 30 to 10, the maximum per gallon, I believe, does not change from 80.
Read more

(2015) Question 78: Under what conditions do gasoline sulfur reduction additives and catalysts reduce sulfur in gasoline, and by how much? What is the lowest gasoline sulfur level for which the gasoline sulfur reduction products are effective? At this gasoline sulfur level, please quantify the gasoline sulfur reduction and the amount of additive/catalyst required.

That is a very long breath of a question. [Laughter] I will summarize some of the Marathon’s findings on gasoline sulfur reduction additives. We have done a lot of testing in our pilot plant in the past. Some of that has already been presented.
Read more

(2015) Question 79: For units that have experienced elevated losses leading to coarse inventory, what options exist to improve catalyst properties during turnaround? Describe your experience with purchasing external or classifying spent catalyst.

We get fixed on how much 0-to-40 micron catalyst is in the inventory. You need 10% to run the unit well. And as Bob Flanders used to say, “Purgatory was trying to run a Model IV with less than 10% fines in it.” What I would suggest is certainly nothing smaller than 20 microns.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Current page 36
  • Page 37
  • Page 38
  • Page 39
  • Page 40
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top