Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • (-) Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Vendor
  • Consultant

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • (-) Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Vendor
  • Consultant

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
Filters

(2017) Question 58: What are your Best Practices for reliably measuring level in the bottom of the main fractionator?

The following tables list the demonstrated technologies to reliably measure main column bottoms (MCB) level. Regardless of the technology used, it is important to have redundant level indication. The Best Practice is to employ two level transmitters with a selector switch for MCB level control. For displacers, guided-wave radar, and dP level transmitters, redundant transmitters should be on independent vessel taps. There are benefits to having two different level technologies employed. For point level measurement, at least two points should be measured for high and low levels.
Read more

(2017) Question 73: Gasoline octanes continue to have a high value for many refineries. What fractionation strategies do you apply to increase gasoline octane? What rules of thumb do you apply for estimating changes in octane with gasoline endpoint adjustments?

RVP and endpoint both have a minor effect on gasoline octane. With other operating parameter changes and repeatability of octane results in the lab (+/- 0.5 RON), it is difficult to quantify small changes in octane caused by fractionation changes. Literature suggests that for every 1.5 psi RVP increase, RON will increase 0.3. We have very little data to support the literature, because the octane and RVP value of mixed C4s is much greater as alkylate than on the frontend of FCC gasoline.
Read more

(2017) Question 74: How do you mitigate aqueous corrosion in the main fractionator overhead and gas concentration unit? What contaminants do you test for in the sour water, and what limits do you impose? What are your concerns with using stripped sour water as waterwash?

Over the last six years, there have been a number of questions related to different aspects of overhead and gas concentration unit corrosion management, including design recommendations. For completion of the Answer Book, here is a brief summary of the topics covered.
Read more

(2017) Question 75: What are your Best Practices in design and operation to achieve positive isolation of slurry/HCO equipment?

Technip’s practice is to specify gate valves with flushing connections at the base of the seat. To ensure positive isolation, the flushing connection can be used to remove any sediments that may be impact the contact of the gate with the seat. Another option is to orient the valve stem off of vertical in order to move the final seating location away from the low point, therefore reducing the chances of sediment to accumulate there.
Read more

(2016) Question 6: What is your experience with having a vent depropanizer off-gas unit in order to manage tower pressure, and what might be the cause of and solution to the problem?

The typical and probably most obvious driver for the need to vent from a depropanizer column is the presence of non-condensable gases. Most commonly, this is ethane and ethylene that come in with the feed.
Read more

(2016) Question 7: How is propane content in the refrigeration loop optimized against the compressor capacity to minimize contractor temperature? Do you have a good process model to predict the optimum propane content?

There is an optimum propane concentration in the refrigerant that will allow the alkylation unit to operate at a maximum alkylate throughput when the unit is up against limitations of both the compressor and the reaction zone heat removal capability. That optimum concentration of propane will vary from unit to unit and can be different seasonally. It can also be different from night to day or if exchangers are fouled, etc.
Read more

(2016) Question 67: As distillate demand has decreased, current economics favor maximizing gasoline and octane. What operating and catalyst changes do you recommend for increasing octane barrels?

An FCC unit contributes to the gasoline pool through both cracked gasoline production and C4s production, which is used to generate high octane alkylate for blending.
Read more

(2016) Question 68: What is your experience with processing raw crude in the FCC? What types of crude have you tried to process in the FCC? What are the yield impacts? Any corrosion issues associated with this mode of operation? What additional corrosion monitoring is needed?

I have not had any experience running raw crude directly into an FCC unit; however, I know there are refiners out there that do. Many refiners who are running a high percentage of tight oils into their crude units have found that there is typically a shortage of FCC feed, which has led to some of them charging tight oils straight into the FCC.
Read more

(2016) Question 69: Our FCC unit is limited by coke burn and high regenerator temperatures. What catalyst and operational changes have you implemented to maximize the conversion of heavy feeds and increase the amount of resid we can process without running into our regenerator limits and increasing dry gas production?

Considering the stated goals and constraints, particularly being limited by regenerator temperature and coke-burning capacity, it will be necessary to reduce delta coke without significantly increasing the reactor heat demand.
Read more

(2016) Question 70: What is your method for measuring naphthenic acid [TAN (total acid number)] in FCC feed? Is this method affected by VABP (volume average boiling point) or Concarbon (Conradson carbon) content? Do you have data that validates an appropriate integrity operating window (IOW) trigger level? If above the trigger level, what is your recommended corrective action (extra inspection, change crude/slate, etc.)?

In terms of TAN number, we typically recommend the standard test method UOP 565, which can be found through the ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) website.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Current page 30
  • Page 31
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top