Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • (-) CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Vendor
  • Consultant

Year QA

  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • (-) CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Vendor
  • Consultant

Year QA

  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
Filters

(2016) Question 73: What criteria do you use to justify sea-less pumps in place of conventional double-seal pumps in LPG services? What are the operational and reliability issues associated with these types of seal-less pumps?

Seal-less pumps can be either mag drive or canned motor. Seal-less pumps are now commonly used all over the refinery and petrochemical industries. The U.S.is quite a bit behind Europe in the use of seal-less pumps. Europe has been specifying seal-less for multiple services since the mid-1980s.
Read more

(2016) Question 74: In your experience, what are the effects of different Ni passivation technologies on the performance of CO promoters and stack emissions?

Nickel passivation can be accomplished a few ways: antimony, bismuth, or sulfur. Adding antimony or bismuth in a solution, such as LCO, will immediately begin to passivate the negative effects of nickel poisoning. Antimony is considered a fugitive emission and may be hazardous; bismuth may be the safer option.
Read more

(2016) Question 75: In your experience, how does the shape of an FCC catalyst particle impact the fluidization properties of the catalyst? What other properties are important to monitor?

The key catalyst properties affecting fluidization are particle size distribution, particle density, and particle shape. Fluidization studies have shown that a change in catalyst shape from spherical to oblong gives a 19% reduction in deaeration rate, due to more drag force with an oblong particle: meaning, itis harder to defluidize this material. However, catalyst with irregular particles and sharp edges, such as attrition generated particles, are harder to unlock and fluidize.
Read more

(2016) Question 76: What FCC operating, and catalytic changes can lower gasoline sulfur while retaining octane? How would feed hydrotreatment impact these options? How would the FCC operate and catalytic changes impact gasoline post-hydrotreating?

Hydrotreating the entire FCC feedstock upfront will allow more flexibility in operation of the reactor/regenerator. Delta coke will decrease with a hydrotreated feedstock, which will lead to a colder regenerator and will drive a higher cat-to-oil ratio. Increasing cat-to-oil will directionally increase both gasoline yield and octane number.
Read more

(2016) Question 77: What are your Best Practices for mitigating operational or performance risks throughout a catalyst changeover?

It is understood that there are risks when changing catalysts. Objectives and constraints might change during the trial, or changes in operating conditions might skew expected performance.
Read more

(2016) Question 78: What operational and catalytic changes have you implemented to optimize C4 olefin yield for the alkylation unit?

A low REO of less than 1% can yield a higher C4 olefinicity compared to catalyst of higher REO at constant conversion. However, as conversion increases, C4 olefinicity will decline.
Read more

(2016) Question 79: What methods do you use to detect and monitor coke deposition in FCCU risers? What prediction methods have been successful?

While coke deposition in reactor void spaces and overhead lines has been reported with some regularity, coking in risers is less common. Increasing riser pressure drop and decreasing riser shell temperatures provide an indication of riser coking, but gamma ray scans are the surest online indication of riser coking.
Read more

(2016) Question 80: What is your Best Practice for removing feed nozzles during turnarounds when only the tips are planned to be replaced? Are there any pros/cons or advantages/disadvantages of removing the nozzles while the system is hot or after it has cooled?

All of these systems work well most of the time; but at times, there can still be problems extracting the nozzles from the sleeves. A common first line of attack in removing a nozzle from a sleeve is to utilize threaded holes in the nozzle flange that are used with “jacking screws "to break a nozzle loose after it is unbolted from the sleeve.
Read more

(2016) Question 81: What is your inspection Best Practices for third-stage separator (TSS) systems throughout a scheduled turnaround? What types of issues or equipment damage should be would you proactively anticipate in order to mitigate potential turnaround delays?

For TSS systems, it becomes important to start by monitoring the operating conditions and process velocities throughout long-term operation to help anticipate the extent of erosion and internal wear of the equipment. Some refiners track velocity hours for the individual cyclones or barrels while others simply track onstream time to help predict when some of the equipment may ultimately fail.
Read more

(2016) Question 82: Have any of your FCC units observed extensive corrosion in carbon steel piping operating below500°F, particularly in the slurry circuit? What are your typical corrosion mechanisms? What metallurgies would you deem acceptable for high-temperature, high-sulfur streams?

We have not seen any issues with piping below 500°F. Sulfidic corrosion is the typical mechanism about which to worry with regard to hot streams containing sulfur, such as FCCU feed and slurry. API Recommended Practice 939C should be referenced for sulfidic corrosion.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Current page 31
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top