Q&A

(2013) Question 94: What methods do you use to determine the condition or remaining life of and regenerator cyclones?

Proper design of cyclones and cyclone support systems will extend the life of cyclones with proper maintenance. But like the tires on your car, it will need to be replaced towards its end-of-life. Just like checking for remaining treads on your tire, one common way to check the remaining life of your cyclone is to measure and log the thickness of your cyclones for each turnaround from their first installations to last turnaround dates.

(2013) Question 95: What failure mechanisms have you observed in cyclone or cyclone support systems? What is the typical time to failure?

In the history of our unit, there have been no outright failures of cyclones or cyclone supports, just partial failures. In our experience, the major cause of failure in cyclones and cyclone supports has been erosion leading to thinning, cracks, and breakages.

(2013) Question 96: What are the typical causes of dipleg plugging/fouling? How can the plugging/fouling be avoided? What is the experience with clearing diplegs online?

I am going to take the question in a few parts. I will cover the reactor side first. In the reactor side, dipleg plugging will generally be due to coke formation that can be subdivided into two categories: the coke formation that occurs either internal to the cyclone or externally. On the gas outlet tube of the cyclone, you will see the stereotypical coke formation on the backside of the gas outlet tube, perhaps from incomplete feed vaporization.

(2013) Question 97: What operational or design changes can be employed to address heat balance issues – e.g., catalyst circulation limits, low regenerator temperatures –associated with processing tight oil-derived feeds?

This answer will be very similar to what was already discussed about how to treat the resids. The example shown on the slide is a Maya blend, a typical tight oil, and then a tight oil with resid. Again, we are seeing significant reductions in sulfur and Conradson carbon metals and also a much higher hydrogen content.

(2013) Question 98: What catalyst changes can be made to minimize the negative effects of low delta coke that result from processing increased amounts of tight oil-derived FCC feed?

The schematic on the slide shows the representation of the coke yield and the coke balance from the FCC. Of course, the total overall weight percent coke yield is set by heat balance, but the sources of the coke vary significantly from one feed to the next. Everyone talked thoroughly about how the coke precursors are just not there in these lighter feeds.

(2013) Question 99: Tight oil-derived FCC feeds are known to contain high levels of contaminant iron (Fe) and calcium (Ca). What catalyst design features are important for minimizing their effects? What level of these contaminants can be tolerated? What lab procedures can accurately simulate Fe and Ca contamination?

There are a lot of parts to this question, so I will respond to them independently. One of the catalyst design features that is important in any kind of feed, when you are going to get high iron and high calcium, is in the porosity. We talked a little before about how these contaminant metals tend to form these eutectics which can melt the surface of the catalyst and close off the pores.

(2013) Question 100: What specific changes in yields and product qualities might be expected when processing large percentages of tight oil-derived feeds? What operational changes can be made to address any problems created by these effects?

We are currently running varying degrees of tight oil at the majority or our refineries. At the refineries that are running a larger percentage of tight oil, the largest field impacts we have identified have been the shift to lighter products. At the same time, it insignificantly increased volume gains and significantly decreased slurry yield.

(2010) Question 56: Some crude tower overhead deposition appears to be linked to corrosion treatment programs (i.e. filming corrosion inhibitors and neutralizers). Have you confirmed this and what are the potential mechanisms that can lead to this deposition?

Corrosion inhibitors (filmers) have been known to cause deposition in several different ways. Generally, the cause is injection into an overhead that is too hot, flashing off the carrier, or injection of neat chemical, flashing off its solvent.

(2010) Question 58: In your experience has a non-phosphorous corrosion inhibitor been successfully used to mitigate naphthenic acid corrosion? In what circumstances and under what conditions are non-phosphorous corrosion inhibitors used?

Phosphorus-based naphthenic acid corrosion inhibitors have been successfully used in the refining industry since the early 1980’s. Phosphorus provides its protection to steel by corroding it and forming a passive layer that, under SEM/EDS, proves to be an Iron/Phosphorus/Sulfur blend.

(2010) Question 59: What are refiners using to define the corrosivity of high acid crude oils and how is this data obtained?

In line with industry rules of thumb, Marathon considers a crude to be high acid with a whole crude Total Acid Number (TAN) above 0.5% or a side stream above 1.5%. With low sulfur crude slates the maximum TAN may be reduced, as one of our refineries that runs a predominantly sweet slate experienced naphthenic acid corrosion resulting in the TAN limit being reduced to 0.3%. Crudes are blended to the refinery TAN limit with sulfur, metallurgy and specific stream temperatures taken into account.

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

Q&A