Q&A

(2010) Question 20: How do refiners quantify the impact of sodium on hydroprocessing units, specifically those processing either residuum or VGO feeds?

Sodium generally enters a hydrotreater due to upstream addition of caustic soda or desalter operational problems. Feed sodium content of more than 3-5 ppm should be avoided. Sodium has a significant deactivation effect; 1-3 %wt results in a 50% loss of catalyst activity.

(2010) Question 23: The liquid recycle rate to a second stage of a hydrocracker can shift conversion, light end yields, cycle length and/or the required temperature to achieve a desired conversion. What strategies do you employ to reach optimum conditions

In two-stage hydrocracking design there are several variables that need to be balanced for optimum performance. Desired product yields or selectivity can be affected by conversion per pass in each stage. Lower conversion per pass is desirable to maximize heavier product selectivity.

(2010) Question 25: Besides high reactor temperatures and flow maldistribution, what are other causes of high gas and LPG yields in a hydrocracker have you experienced?

Hydrocrackers typically process heavy gas oils into distillate-range material. The gas oils are catalytically cracked at high pressures in the presence of hydrocracking catalyst and hydrogen. The reaction is exothermic and consumes a relatively large quantity of hydrogen. High gas and LPG yields would be generally undesirable in a properly operating hydrocracker.

(2010) Question 28: The Clean Air Act required refineries to develop and implement a Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) program to control fugitive emissions. What is the current status of this implementation and who is responsible for it in a typical refinery management structure: production, maintenance or EHS?

Since the inception of the Clean Air Act of 1955 and multiple amendments through 1990, Leak Detection and Repair or LDAR regulations have been a part of air pollution control. Today’s LDAR programs are governed by Federal and State regulations and agreed orders (consent decrees) that provide the control of fugitive emission leaks from process equipment by requiring equipment inspections and leaking equipment repair.

(2010) Question 29: What technologies do you use for treating or recovering VOCs from small-scale truck loading terminals? Discuss the merits associated with each?

The three main VOC treating systems for small scale truck loading are vapor combustion system, flare gas recovery unit, and an adsorption/absorption vapor recovery system.

(2008) Question 1: What are your experiences taking reactor effluent samples? What safety issues do you consider when taking samples? What do you consider to be best practices?

Question 1: What are your experiences taking reactor effluent samples? What safety issues do you consider when taking samples? What do you consider to be best practices? Edwin Yuh (UOP) UOP has traditionally included sampling capability in our licensed units when there are multiple reactor systems. For example, a sample point is typically installed at the pretreat reactor outlet before the cracking reactor in hydrocracking units to measure nitrogen slip. Many UOP licensees collect reactor effluent samples routinely. Quite a few recently licensed units are designed as integrated hydroprocessing units processing different feeds with different catalyst systems.

(2008) Question 2: Do you re-evaluate your unit operating procedures at regular intervals? How often? What principles/standards are these procedures reviewed against?

Question 2: Do you re-evaluate your unit operating procedures at regular intervals? How often? What principles/standards are these procedures reviewed against? David Rapavi (HOVENSA) HOVENSA reviews and re-issues unit operating procedures in accordance with OSHA Standard 1910.119 paragraph (f)(3), which states “Operating procedures shall be reviewed as often as necessary to assure that they reflect current operating practice, including changes that result from changes in process chemicals, technology and equipment, and changes to facilities.

(2019) Question 15: What practices and modifications have you implemented in response to the new High Temperature Hydrogen Attack (HTHA) guidelines and updated Nelson curves?

JOE RYDBERG (CITGO)
The primary source document for dealing with High Temperature Hydrogen Attack (HTHA) is API Recommended Practice 941 – Steels for Hydrogen Service at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures in Petroleum Refineries and Petrochemical Plants. This document provides the basic guidelines

(2019) Question 16: What is required to achieve Safety Integrity Level 2 (SIL-2) rating on the hydrocracker depressuring system? For a hydrotreater that does not require SIL-2, what position should the depressurization valve fail to?

JOE RYDBERG (CITGO)
CITGO typically seeks process safety consultants to help with SIS design including SIL selection. Kenexis is such a company who has provided the following technical information regarding depressurization systems.

There are a multitude of different initiating events (loss of

(2019) Question 17: What testing frequency and additional feed characterization (apart from bulk properties) should be used to accurately monitor catalyst performance on heavy feeds?

FERNANDO MALDONADO (Shell Catalysts & Technologies)
The type and frequency of tests performed are unit and refinery specific. When creating or modifying a unit’s laboratory test schedule some factors to be considered include:

1.   Unit objectives
2.   Past and/or current operational issues
3.

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

Q&A