Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • (-) Operations
    • Process
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • Crude/Coking
    • (-) Operations
    • Process
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2018) Question 18: Vacuum Gas Oil (VGO) Hydrotreaters are being pushed to process heavier feeds while maximizing Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) performance while meeting Tier III gasoline specifications. How are you balancing increased severity and cycle length? What considerations do you give to feed quality and upstream unit operations?

The FCC unit has long been the workhorse in the refinery to achieve relatively low-cost conversion of heavy crude components (VGO, HCGO and some atmospheric residue) into gasoline, butenes for high-octane alkylate production, propylene and LCO diesel blend components.
Read more

(2018) Question 19: What considerations do you use for designing a hydrocracking reactor? What criteria do you use to determine number of beds, diameter, and beds’ lengths?

Hydrocracking reactor design is a proprietary technology with each licensor having their own specific design practice based on operating experience, catalyst technology, and engineering expertise. It is not the purpose of this forum to reveal proprietary technology, but to improve refiners’ operations through shared experience.
Read more

(2018) Question 20: What considerations do you give to co-processing or block mode operations with renewables in an existing hydroprocessing unit?

In all scenarios, a refiner must consider their RFS obligations, potential biodiesel tax incentives, biodiesel merchant market, refiner’s existing hydrotreating units’ utilization rates, capabilities, and designs, renewable feedstock types, availability, price, and pre-treatment requirements, and product specifications and storage constraints.
Read more

(2018) Question 21: What are your important considerations for water washing with respect to: 1) Intermittent injection a. Process temperature of injection b. Duration of injection c. Frequency - triggers to begin d. How frequently before making it continuously? 2) Water Quality: a. pH range b. Oxygen c. Total Suspended solids d. Total dissolved solids e. Recirculation vs. make-up f. Other

Hotter temperatures typically will increase in the need for better designed injection systems. The injection mix point needs to be designed to contact and scrub the vapor well, with adequate dilution of water, with metallurgy at the injection point selected to handle the lower pH of the droplets.
Read more

(2018) Question 22: Can you elaborate on the benefits, drawbacks, and trade-offs of liquid phase vs. gas phase catalyst activation in a hydrocracking unit? Is there an activity or yield difference of liquid phase or gas phase activation of 2nd stage catalyst in a 2-stage hydrocracking unit? Consider both catalyst formulation and operational factors (MPT, excursion risk, etc.)

Activation (or sulfiding) of hydrotreating and hydrocracking catalysts can be done either ex-situ or in-situ. In both methods, the objective is to convert all the catalyst’s metal oxide sites to active metal sulfides.
Read more

(2018) Question 23: What are the sources of silicon that can impact a hydrotreater? How does silicon affect hydrotreater operations? What are your best practices for managing / mitigating silicon poisoning?

One source of silicon is antifoam chemistries. These may be introduced into HDS feeds via use in the Coker process within the refinery or via use in production upstream of the refinery.
Read more

(2018) Question 24: How many refiners import and/or purchase gasoil feed for a hydroprocessing unit? What are common issues associated with imported or purchased gasoil feeds? Are there specific characteristics to target and / or avoid? Are there best practices for minimizing negative impacts to unit operations / reliability? How are supply limitations managed?

Key characteristics of imported feed like end point, sulfur, nitrogen, chlorides and carbon residue can be controlled by establishing allowed specifications. But other characteristics may be hard to control.
Read more

(2018) Question 46: What is your strategy to minimize main fractionator bottoms (DCO/ Slurry) versus LCO production apart from feed quality/catalyst selection?

The primary operational handles to minimize bottoms production is optimization of the cat to oil in the R&R. As the C/O is increased more of the heavy oils will be converted. As with all good things in the FCC this can be taken too far. Limits can be reached on the actual operating equipment in this process.
Read more

(2018) Question 47: Are there any operational parameters that can be manipulated to improve the operation of the slurry circuit and minimize fouling? Can you outline the slurry exchanger circuit recommended design practices to minimize fouling, plugging and erosion?

Temperature: From experience, the rate of coke build-up increases greatly when the bottoms temperature is > 700F (370°C). It is recommended to maintain the bottoms temperature below 680°F (360°C) to be on the safe side.
Read more

(2018) Question 48: What is the range of activity for FCC catalysts in the FCCUs? When is catalyst activity considered too low? When do you decide to reformulate versus changes in operating conditions in order to increase unit conversion?

BASF receives ECAT from about 200 FCC units worldwide. Of these, the ECAT activity ranges from 60-80, with approximately 75% of the units operating in the 70-76 activity range. The global average for 2017 was 72.5 and so far in 2018 the global average is 72.7.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Current page 36
  • Page 37
  • Page 38
  • Page 39
  • Page 40
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top