Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • (-) Catalysts
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • (-) Catalysts
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2017) Question 31: What are the potential impacts to hydrocracking units [i.e., deactivation rate, HPNA (heavy polynuclear aromatics) formation, etc.] as heavy coker gasoil (HCGO) rate/endpoint are increased?

Processing heavier and cracked feedstocks poses many challenges to the hydrocracking unit. Thermally-cracked feedstock such as HCGO, apart from being unsaturated, has relatively lower API, higher sulfur, and nitrogen content, higher proportion of C7 insoluble, and Conradson carbon residue (CCR). An increase in the HCGO distillation endpoint results in a significant increase in the proportion of polynuclear aromatics (PNA) and asphaltenes, both of which are coke precursors, which results in an exponential increase in catalyst deactivation rates. 
Read more

(2017) Question 32: A) What are the variations of target efficiency that can be achieved in hydrogen plant operation? B) What are the operational factors that impact efficiency?

When discussing efficiencies, it is important to define the plant efficiency term. In most cases, hydrogen plant efficiency is measured by calculating the energy [BTU/scf (British thermal unit/standard cubic foot)] required to generate product hydrogen.
Read more

(2010) Question 85: What is the typical range that you employ for iron content on FCC equilibrium catalyst? What methods are available to determine how iron is accumulated on the catalyst surface? How does the distribution of iron on the catalyst surface impact the FCC operation, yield structure and emissions?

There are several methods available to quantify iron contamination on catalyst. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) pictures are a valuable means to qualitatively assess iron laydown morphology on the catalyst particle.
Read more

(2010) Question 86: In your experience, what are catalyst best practices to shift FCC yields rapidly between gasoline and diesel maximization and then back again? Many catalyst suppliers are recommending blended catalyst systems. Do you believe this catalyst/additive blending is the best approach?

Co-catalysts are a new product category providing the refiner with the flexibility to change the product slate of the FCC without changing the FCC catalyst. Changing between a maximum gasoline co-catalyst and a maximum LCO co-catalyst will allow the refiner to rapidly capture the most favorable economics at all times – maximizing FCC profitability. Co-catalysts are added to the base catalyst to rapidly change the core performance of the FCC.
Read more

(2010) Question 87: In your experience, how does catalyst activity affect the catalyst's coke selectivity and the FCCU's delta coke? How are the coke selectivity and delta coke related? Lastly, discuss how to determine the proper activity to maximize conversion.

When designing an FCC catalyst, one must consider coke selectivity, delta coke and total coke yield. Coke selectivity is the relative coke-making tendency of the catalyst, or in other words, a catalyst with good coke selectivity produces higher conversion per unit of coke make than the reference catalyst.
Read more

(2019) Question 52: What strategies have you employed to profitably manage Tier III regulations (i.e. crude purchasing strategy, pre/post treating, FCC operational changes, sulfur reducing additives, etc.)?

Question 52: What strategies have you employed to profitably manage Tier III regulations (i.e., crude purchasing strategy, pre/post treating, FCC operational changes, sulfur reducing additives, etc.)?
Read more

(2018) Question 11: What constitutes adequate quench reserve when you process cracked feedstocks in hydrotreating units? In hydrocracking units? What if a mixture of both gas and liquid quench is used?

Maintaining control means that the dog walker – needs to be able to hang on to the dog – even if it starts to walk or run away. This takes adequate reserve strength - and an early detection and response when the dog just begins to become distracted or when we begin to feel the pull on the leash.
Read more

(2018) Question 12: Discuss impacts of hydrotreating operations required to meet Tier III regulations. Highlight the benefits and concerns of pretreat versus post treat operations including; impacts on cycle length, FCC yields, octane from post treating options, and gasoline blending.

Regulatory specifications for the gasoline and diesel pool, which are constantly evolving, have been in the forefront of refiners’ challenges in the last 15 plus years. In particular, the gasoline sulfur regulations have been a main driver for the remodeling of many refineries’ configurations.
Read more

(2018) Question 13: What factors do you consider when co-processing jet fuel in a distillate hydrotreater versus processing the jet separately (including feedstock and unit consideration)?

There are several considerations when deciding if jet fuel and diesel should be co-processed or hydrotreated separately. The most important consideration is if the jet fuel will be blended into the diesel product or if separate products are desired. The decision may depend on if you are looking at constructing new facilities or making the best use of existing equipment.
Read more

(2018) Question 14: In your experience, what operational factors contribute most to utility costs in hydrotreating units?

The biggest contributor to utility cost per barrel in a hydrotreater is probably the unit operating pressure. Higher pressure units require more energy to pump up the charge, hydrogen, amine and wash water.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Current page 34
  • Page 35
  • Page 36
  • Page 37
  • Page 38
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top