Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • (-) Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts
  • (-) Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2012) Question 3: How can lubricity be improved in ultra-low sulfur jet fuel?

The increased desulfurization of distillate fuels removes sulfur nitrogen and aromatics, which are components favorable for lubricity properties. The recent market conditions have led most refiners to not only produce ULSD, but also ULSK (ultra-low sulfur kerosene), in order to maximize distillate production.
Read more

(2012) Question 4: What are the hydrotreating operating issues when processing shale-derived light, sweet, and highly paraffinic crudes such as Bakken, Eagle Ford, and Utica? What hydrotreating/catalyst strategies can offset any negative effects? What options are available to optimize the distillate hydrotreater(s) with these light, sweet crudes?

The shale crudes in question are highly paraffinic, low sulfur, low nitrogen, and low in conventional contaminants. However, we do see some trace contaminants coming in from some of the fracking and completion chemicals. These crudes have a low resid content, which impacts the bottom of the barrel.
Read more

(2017) Question 45: What are your typical consequences and probable sources of fuel gas fouling? What are your respective solutions?

Fuel gas fouling in refineries is an ongoing problem and is typically the result of many years of corrosion due to moisture in the fuel gas system. These systems are typically saturated with water vapor due to the amine scrubbing that is used to remove H2S, and water may drop out as a liquid in low velocity areas or in areas with inadequate insulation.
Read more

(2017) Question 50: From this list of your top FCC gas plant constraints, which area is your primary constraint: 1) main column (MC) overhead, 2) wet gas compressor, 3) primary or sponge absorber, 4) stripper, or 5) debutanizer bottoms or overhead?

Refining investments in alkylation expansions and gasoline octane improvements require production of additional feedstock for the alkylation unit. The primary source of olefin feedstock for the alkylation unit is the FCC unit. Operating conditions in the FCC unit can be adjusted to favor increased propylene and butylene production. The FCC wet gas compressor becomes the first major bottleneck in recovering the incremental propylene and butylene. Modifications may be required to the compressor, as well as associated cooling, inter-stage, or after-stage equipment. 
Read more

(2017) Question 51: Can you comment on the safety aspects of placing catalyst in a standpipe to help isolate one vessel from the other? Does the existence of catalyst in a standpipe create a ‘seal’?

I would like to mention that we will have a P&P tomorrow on this topic, so I will try to keep my answer short. It is assumed that this question relates to using the slide or plug valve to form a seal between the regenerator and the reactor during shutdowns. I would like to point out that this is a standard practice in an FCC as there is really no other option; and for the most part, it does work. 
Read more

(2017) Question 52: What challenges do you face for implementing safety-instrumented systems that result in closure of the FCC slide valves?

Systems are designed to meet a specific safety integrity level (SIL). Each operating company has a risk-based matrix specific to the company or site. This matrix has severity on one axis and probability on the other axis. High severity and high probability score the highest. Based on this ranking system, the company sets the SIL rating at SIL 1, 2, or 3. SIL 1 and 2 are the most commonly found in typical refinery processes.
Read more

(2017) Question 53: What factors contribute to stack opacity? What options do you use for reducing stack opacity?

Opacity measurements are influenced by particle density, particle refractive index, particle size distribution and particle color/composition. In this system, particles present are typically either catalyst particles which are not retained in the FCC, or condensed particulates from the combustion products that form due to local conditions.
Read more

(2017) Question 54: What recent innovations have you made to instrumentation that has application in FCC units?

For level measurement, guided-wave radar level instruments have been gaining popularity and been successfully applied in numerous services, especially for interface levels. Nuclear-type level instruments have been more or less accepted in other processing units in refineries and have made their way into the FCCU for severe services, such as main fractionator bottoms level, and for hopper levels.
Read more

(2017) Question 59: We are reformulating our FCCU catalyst. What are your Best Practices to post-audit the catalyst change?

Preplanning is an important part of ensuring that the catalyst reformulation and post-audit are successful. Before the catalyst trial begins, it is important to define catalyst objectives and establish a clear evaluation plan on how these objectives will be monitored and evaluated for the trial. Sample and data collection guidelines and establishing a good base case should be done before the trial. It is critical that the samples and processed data needed to monitor the reformulation are routinely collected before and during the trial.
Read more

(2017) Question 60: With today’s current variety of new crudes, synthetic crudes, tight oils, bio-based streams, opportunity feeds, etc. that find their way to the FCCU, what new metal contaminants (excluding nickel, vanadium, iron, and sodium) do you see that impact catalyst and FCC performance?

In addition to the “standard” contaminants of nickel, vanadium, iron, and sodium, there are a variety of other feed contaminants that can impact FCC performance. For example, tight oils (also known as shale oils) can contain high levels of potassium, magnesium and calcium in addition to the iron normally found in them8. While bio-based feedstocks are not yet widely processed in commercial units, they would be expected to contain higher levels of calcium, sodium, magnesium, and potassium than conventional feed sources since these elements all play an important role in biological systems. High levels of phosphorous have been found on synthetic crudes.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 49
  • Page 50
  • Page 51
  • Page 52
  • Current page 53
  • Page 54
  • Page 55
  • Page 56
  • Page 57
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top