Skip to main content
Home Home

Main navigation

  • Industries
    • Products
    • Operations
    • Performance
    • People
    • Contributions

    Industries

    We represent the makers of the fuels that keep Americans moving and the petrochemicals that are the essential building blocks for modern life. Our industries make life better, safer, more productive and — most of all — possible.

  • Issues
    • Fuels & Vehicles
    • Environment
    • Petrochemicals
    • Safety & Health
    • Security
    • Tax & Trade
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
    • Regulatory Reform

    Issues

    We advocate for public policies that promote growth and investment in the refining and petrochemical manufacturing industries to help drive our economy, add jobs, increase energy security and remain competitive in a global economy.

  • Events
    • My Meetings
    • Speaker Guidelines
    • Meeting FAQ
    • Sponsorship
    • Upcoming Events

    View AFPM Calendar of Events

    We offer a portfolio of first-in-class events that educate our members and other stakeholders on critical technical and advocacy issues, supporting the safety, security and success of the fuel and petrochemical industries.

     

  • Newsroom
  • Search
    Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Utility Menu (Mobile)

  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Data & Reports
  • Safety Programs

User account menu

  • My AFPM

Social Media Menu - Header

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

Utility Menu

  • About Us
    • About AFPM
    • Our History
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • AFPM Membership
    • Member Directory
  • Data & Reports
    • Data & Statistics
    • Publications
    • Technical Papers
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
  • Safety Programs
    • Safety Portal
    • Advancing Process Safety Programs
    • Occupational Safety Programs
    • Safety Statistics Programs
    • Safety Awards & Recognition
Enter a list of keywords and press Enter to submit your search query.

Q&A

Find the answer to your technical question in AFPM's extensive Q&A database.

wave
  1. Data & Reports
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Q&A

Q&A

These digital transcripts are meant to share information on process safety practices in order to help improve process safety performance and awareness throughout industry. The goal is to capture and share knowledge that could be used by other companies or sites when developing new process safety practices or improving existing ones. The documents being shared have been used by an industry member, but this does not mean it should be used or that it will produce similar results at any other site. Rather, it is an option to consider when implementing or adjusting programs and practices at a site. ​

BY THEMSELVES, THESE DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTS ARE NOT STANDARDS OR RECOMMENDED PRACTICES. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE SOUND ENGINEERING JUDGMENT. THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS THAT COMPLY WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO DETERMINING WHETHER A PRACTICE CAN BE USED IN ANY SPECIFIC SITUATION. 

​

Process

  • (-) Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • (-) Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Search Filters

Process

  • (-) Crude/Coking
    • Process
    • Operations
    • Corrosion
    • Mechanical
    • Coker
    • Reliability
    • Crude Quality
    • Vacuum Tower
    • Distillation
    • CAT POLY Units (CAT Poly)
    • Desalting
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Safety
  • (-) Hydroprocessing
    • Catalysts
    • Resid Hydrocracking
    • Hydrocracking Catalyst
    • Feed Quality
    • Fouling
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • ULSD
  • Gasoline Processing
    • Safety
    • Gasoline Processing
    • Desalting
    • Reforming
    • Catalytic Reforming
    • Isomerization
    • Naphtha Hydrotreating
    • Aromatics
    • HF Alkylation (HF Alky)
    • Blending
    • Plant Services
  • FCC
    • Alkylation
    • Environmental
    • Catalysts

Submitter

  • Operator
  • Licensor
  • Consultant
  • Vendor

Year QA

  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2008
Filters

(2010) Question 18: What are your key strategies to maximize the heavy diesel barrels in the diesel pool without cracking? Do you consider blending and dewaxing etc. to meet product specifications?

Generally maximizing heavy diesel barrels in the total refinery diesel pool would be based on distillation cut points the diesel processing units, mainly crude atmospheric columns. The objective is to maximize barrels by increasing distillation cut points up to distillation cut point maximum or to product quality specifications.
Read more

(2010) Question 19: In your experience, what are the effects on ULSD hydrotreaters when FCC operation is adjusted to maximize diesel?

There are a number of approaches to maximize the diesel yield from FCC units, such as catalyst optimization, process modifications, and changing the FCC product cut points. These approaches can be used independently or in combination - the ultimate objective being to maximize the production of light-cycle oil (LCO) from the FCC unit for subsequent conversion to diesel.
Read more

(2010) Question 20: How do refiners quantify the impact of sodium on hydroprocessing units, specifically those processing either residuum or VGO feeds?

Sodium generally enters a hydrotreater due to upstream addition of caustic soda or desalter operational problems. Feed sodium content of more than 3-5 ppm should be avoided. Sodium has a significant deactivation effect; 1-3 %wt results in a 50% loss of catalyst activity.
Read more

(2010) Question 23: The liquid recycle rate to a second stage of a hydrocracker can shift conversion, light end yields, cycle length and/or the required temperature to achieve a desired conversion. What strategies do you employ to reach optimum conditions

In two-stage hydrocracking design there are several variables that need to be balanced for optimum performance. Desired product yields or selectivity can be affected by conversion per pass in each stage. Lower conversion per pass is desirable to maximize heavier product selectivity.
Read more

(2010) Question 25: Besides high reactor temperatures and flow maldistribution, what are other causes of high gas and LPG yields in a hydrocracker have you experienced?

Hydrocrackers typically process heavy gas oils into distillate-range material. The gas oils are catalytically cracked at high pressures in the presence of hydrocracking catalyst and hydrogen. The reaction is exothermic and consumes a relatively large quantity of hydrogen. High gas and LPG yields would be generally undesirable in a properly operating hydrocracker.
Read more

(2010) Question 34: What has been the experience of refiners operating selective hydrotreating of FCC naphtha regarding gum formation potential of the low sulfur gasoline? Is gum inhibitor addition a recommended practice?

Gum potential exists with unsaturated hydrocarbons (olefins or diolefins) stored in refinery operations with oxygen as a free radical. Organic sulfur and nitrogen compounds remaining in FCC gasoline product can form gums in the presence of olefins and oxygen.
Read more

(2010) Question 47: What are the best practices for corrosion probe selection, installation and reliability, especially in high temperature and/or high H2S environments?

Some things to consider when selecting and installing corrosion probes are to match the metallurgy of the probe to the pipe.
Read more

(2010) Question 48: In your experience, what is the preferred online (non-destructive) method to identify risk of HIC (hydrogen induced cracking) in gasoline processing units?

The preferred method of identifying the risk of hydrogen induced cracking is to measure the permeation or flux of hydrogen on the outside surface of the equipment and correlate this to the corrosion rate on the inside of the pipe.
Read more

(2008) Question 1: What are your experiences taking reactor effluent samples? What safety issues do you consider when taking samples? What do you consider to be best practices?

Question 1: What are your experiences taking reactor effluent samples? What safety issues do you consider when taking samples? What do you consider to be best practices? Edwin Yuh (UOP) UOP has traditionally included sampling capability in our licensed units when there are multiple reactor systems. For example, a sample point is typically installed at the pretreat reactor outlet before the cracking reactor in hydrocracking units to measure nitrogen slip. Many UOP licensees collect reactor effluent samples routinely. Quite a few recently licensed units are designed as integrated hydroprocessing units processing different feeds with different catalyst systems.
Read more

(2008) Question 2: Do you re-evaluate your unit operating procedures at regular intervals? How often? What principles/standards are these procedures reviewed against?

Question 2: Do you re-evaluate your unit operating procedures at regular intervals? How often? What principles/standards are these procedures reviewed against? David Rapavi (HOVENSA) HOVENSA reviews and re-issues unit operating procedures in accordance with OSHA Standard 1910.119 paragraph (f)(3), which states “Operating procedures shall be reviewed as often as necessary to assure that they reflect current operating practice, including changes that result from changes in process chemicals, technology and equipment, and changes to facilities.
Read more

Pagination

  • First page
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 73
  • Page 74
  • Page 75
  • Page 76
  • Current page 77
  • Page 78
  • Page 79
  • Page 80
  • Page 81
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page

Data & Reports

  • Data & Statistics
  • Publications
  • Technical Papers
  • Annual Report
  • Sustainability Report

Stay in the Know

Subscribe to our monthly industry insights newsletter.

Footer menu (first)

  • My AFPM
  • Events
  • Safety Portal
  • Petrochemical Portal

Footer menu (second)

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal

Connect with Us

  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon
  • Icon

© 2025 AFPM. All rights reserved 
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
1800 M Street, NW Suite 900 North
Washington, DC 20036

Back to Top